Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Evening Standard

Jackie Kennedy fashion: From wedding dress to pink Chanel ...

Evening Standard-Mar. 27, 2019
... From wedding dress to pink Chanel suit, the former First Lady's iconic style .... But her most iconic looks came together when she paired her pillbox hat with a ...
Story image for iconic gown from The Sun

Princess Diana, Bella Hadid, Liz Hurley and the sexiest ...

The Sun-Jul. 2, 2019
IN a little black dress with plunging neckline and thigh-high split, Princess Diana ... far from a scorned wife by wearing the most iconic revenge dress of all time.
Story image for iconic gown from WWD

'The Genius of Jennifer Lopez Is It's Always a Full Head-to-Toe ...

WWD-Jun. 3, 2019
Zangardi credits Lopez's green navel-grazing Versace dress, worn to the 2000 Grammys, as one of her most iconic looks — though it was before their tenure of ...
Story image for iconic gown from BET

Khloé Kardashian Gets Called Out AGAIN For Copying ...

BET-Apr. 22, 2019
... Gets Called Out AGAIN For Copying Rihanna's Iconic CFDA Gown ... to the resemblance between Khloé's dress and Rih's iconic 2014 CFDA Fashion Awards ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

But on the other hand, and subject content there is nothing like perfect sense. Any object, as already noted, gets a sense from the person, under the decision of its tasks. And to put the content or substantive meaning only in case if their tasks are meaningful, ie, got the point.

It's kind of logical contradiction. However, no contradiction is actually there. Substantive meaning is in the mind, in the conceptual structures, which are then invested in the construction of any subject area. But the presentation of it and the design only in essence, in content, and in any case not in detail or structure.

The question in this case is about philosophy and has a long history, the phenomenon: "act, telling sense", i.e. on such activities, which gives meaning to things or objects. This act may report only the consciousness. But this possibility exists only in the case when the mind dominates and constructs the objects, giving them a certain meaning. And again only from the point of view of solving its task.

In any other case, the meaning arises spontaneously as a result of "game casual interaction" of objects and subjects. This equally applies to consciousness when it takes the role of dominant, and is, so to speak, an ordinary subject in a spontaneous interaction. In this case, the meaning is produced as if by itself, but in any case is valuable for all actors.

But there is another situation when a person tries to reveal the essence of things and thus get a substantive sense. But in this case it comes from the conceptual meaning as the integrity and essence. In other words, consciousness seeks the essence of the General meaning, the General content and nothing more. But again, not washed away by itself, and under the decision of its tasks. Beyond the decision of his assandChi is the meaning of the object person does not exist.