Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from NPR

Who Gives A Damn About Scarlett O'Hara's Dresses?

NPR-Aug. 13, 2010
Great balls of fire, Mammy, Miss Scarlett's dresses are falling apart! The iconic costumes worn by actress Vivien Leigh in Gone With the Wind are suffering loose ...
Story image for iconic gown from Independent

The hospital gown gets iconic makeover

Independent-Sep. 15, 2010
Many women cherish their figure-flattering iconic print DVF wrap dress, and now those stuck in hospital beds can feel a bit better about themselves with a new ...
Story image for iconic gown from Telegraph.co.uk

Princess Diana's dress worn on first official appearance to be ...

Telegraph.co.uk-Apr. 12, 2010
Now the iconic dress is set to fetch up to £50,000 when it appears at Kerry Taylor ... The dress caused a sensation when Lady Diana Spencer, as she then was, ...
Story image for iconic gown from hellomagazine.com

Iconic weddings: Grace Kelly and Prince Rainier III of Monaco

hellomagazine.com-Apr. 20, 2010
Grace wore a beige lace dress and hat, and after exchanging their vows, husband and wife made a brief appearance on the palace's balcony to wave to the 500 ...


Pearl Necklace said...

what society can learn about the needs that it takes in the current state, only from their technological environment. For fundamental science it is characteristic to access unknown properties, which can change the model of the technological environment and to create unforeseen needs. He cites the example of the use of solid materials for strengthening and development of the physics of solids. Such a "negative adjustment" of social interactions and needs in the modern technical object criticized R. Jolena (Jaulin R. Le mythe technologique // Revue de l'entreprise.

Anonymous said...

I would like to return to the question of religious exegesis. Why don't you
say about its value? There is another thing that, in my opinion,
we must not forget: the history of translation. Every translator of the Bible says
himself that he sets forth divine truth, and therefore must
to vydayut in the translation of infinite meanings. With time translations
changed, and through this evolution it is possible to find something... But it's very
a difficult question.
One more question. I was thinking about possible relationships
between Nietzsche and Freud. Neither the works of Freud, nor in the book of Jones,
you will find almost nothing about it. Then I said to myself: "Maybe
the problem is the opposite: why Freud was silent about Nietzsche?"
There are two aspects. First, in 1908, the disciples of Freud, Rank, and
Adler, conducted a small seminar on the theme of similarity or
the analogies between Nietzsche's ideas (particularly his "Genealogy of morality") and
the ideas of Freud. Freud treated this very cautiously, giving them
to act at its own discretion, and I domay that he could say
for this reason like this: "Nietzsche introduces too many ideas
at the same time".
Second, beginning in 1910, Freud had a relationship with Lou
Salomé 4). He certainly tried to hold her didactic analysis.
Therefore, we can talk about his kind of therapeutic relationship
between Freud and Nietzsche, the attitude, mediated by Lou salomé. Therefore, Freud
and could not to talk about it. But, of course, all that Lou salomé later
published, belongs in the basis for this is not a limited
the time analysis. It should be read in this perspective.
In addition, in the book of Freud "Moses and monotheism", you can see a kind of
dialogue with the "Genealogy of morality". You see, I offer you a problem.
Do You know anything about this?