Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Story image for Iconic Celebrity from PEOPLE.com

Kylie Jenner Recreates One of Marilyn Monroe's Most Iconic ...

PEOPLE.com-Oct. 31, 2019
The Kylie Cosmetics mogul, 22, recreated one of Marilyn Monroe's most iconic looks — the late actress' iconic hot pink dress from the 1953 film Gentlemen ...
Story image for Iconic Celebrity from Stylist Magazine

23 iconic red hair looks to inspire your next colour update

Stylist Magazine-Oct. 29, 2019
Whether you want a wash of red √† la Sienna Miller or a deep chocolatey hue like Julia Roberts, we've rounded up some of the most iconic celebrity red hair ...
Story image for Iconic Celebrity from HELLO!

11 Vegan Celebrities: All the stars who eat a plant-based diet

HELLO!-Jan. 8, 2019
Whether it's down to environmental, ethical or health reasons, veganism is definitely on the rise and many of our favourite celebrities have adopted the ...
Story image for Iconic Celebrity from PEOPLE.com

Hijinks on the High Seas: These Iconic Celeb Boat Moments ...

PEOPLE.com-Aug. 9, 2019
All hail the Queen of Unconventionally Riding Boats! Lady Gaga was promoting A Star Is Born at Venice Film Festival in 2018 when she simply glided into the ...

2 comments:

Pearl Necklace said...




when it contains, in contrast to the previously known and amenable to reasoning and proof. She is the model of "open system"224 where the relevance of the utterance lies in the fact that it "gives birth to ideas", i.e., other statements and other game rules. In science there is a General metalanguage that can be rewritten in all other languages, and in which they can be evaluated. It inhibits identification with the system and, ultimately, terror. Stratification on decision-makers and executors, unless it exists in the scientific community (and it exists), refers not to scientific pragmatics, and socio-economic system. It is one of the major obstacles for the development of imagination in cognition.


In a generalized form the question of legitimation becomes a question of the relation between the anti-model, presents the scientific pragmatics and society. Is it applicable to forming a society the vast clouds of language matter? Or remains limited game knowledge? And if so, what is its role in relation to social connections? The unattainable ideal of an open community? A necessary component of the subgroup of the decisive makers for companies the effectiveness criterion, which they refuse to recognize in relation to ourselves? Or Vice versa lack of cooperation with authorities and the transition to

Anonymous said...

something completely different than what makes
possible the author of the novel. Texts of Ann Radcliffe has opened a field for a specific
the number of similarities and analogies which had a pattern or principle in it
work. This work contains characteristic signs, figures, relationships,
structures that could be reused by others. To say that
Ann Radclif based horror novel - so, in the end, to say:
the horror novel of the nineteenth century will encounter, like Ann Radcliffe, the theme of the heroine
caught in the trap of his own innocence, the figure of the secret castle
functioning as controued, the character of the black accursed character,
designed to get the world to atone for the evil that it cause, etc.
When I speak of Marx or Freud as "the founders of discursivity",
I want to say that they made possible not only a certain number of
analogies, they have made possible - and in equal measure - and a number
differences. They opened a space for something different from itself, and the
at least, belonging to what they founded. To say that Freud founded
psychoanalysis does not mean to say - not just say - what a concept
libido or the technique of dream analysis is common among Abraham or Melanie
Klein, is to say that Freud made possible a number of differences
in relation to his texts, his notions, his hypotheses - differences
all of which, however, the most relevant psychoanalytic discourse.
Immediately, I believe there will be a new challenge or at least -
new problem: is this case is not, in the end, the case of any
the founder of the science or of any author who has produced science transformation
which can be considered fruitful?