Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
Consider in this regard two important points of the argumentation of Luhmann. The first point: on the one hand, the system can only function by reducing complexity, and on the other it should produce dynamic expectations (expectations) of individuals to their own goals215. Reduction of the complexity requires competence systems to productivity growth. If all messages could circulate freely between all individuals, then a large amount of information that needs to be taken into account to make the right choices significantly increase the life of the solution, therefore, would reduce the performance. Indeed, speed is a component of performance ensemble.We reject the need to take account of these "molecular" opinions, if you don't want to be exposed to the danger of a major upheaval. Luhmann says - and this is the second point - that it is possible to manage personal expectations through a process of "quasi-doctrine" "impervious to any shocks" to expectations are compatible with the solutions of the system. These last do not exist in order to satisfy the expectations: the expectations by
some strukturalistischen currents in literary criticism (for example, the "new criticism" in England and France), as well aspsychology, theoretical Ethnography, art history. All of theseschools and currents were, however, confined to thethe special scientific studies and had widepublic outcry, which is different from the Frenchstructuralism 1960 -- 1970-ies. As a rule, he is nowhave in mind even when we are talking about structuralismat all. This is caused by a number of methodological circumstances,socio-psychological philosophical and ideological plan. As French structuralism was chronologically farnot first among the other strukturalistischen trends in Europe andAmerica, his task was not to identify methods (this wasalready made in structural linguistics), but in applying them tothe wider material culture. It is quite clear that suchusing their initial precision and rigor instudying various products of human activitiesmade public opinion much more impressiverather than Desk studies of glossematics or descriptivists. Asknow that France had their own schools structurallinguistics and didn't know any significantthe spread of logical positivism with its external prestigestrict academic rigour, and because the borrowing of linguistic methodsamazed, transformed structuralism in "fashion".
Post a Comment