Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
When we talk about the semantic interpretation of sentences, we mean that the meaning is always expressed in some logical form the relationship of the main and not the main objects of the proposals. The logical relationship holds meaning in some logical form (one logical logical education through another education), which allows to understand the content of the proposal. When it is argued that, for example, And there are (S is P), then there shall be a logical sequence and principles of the relationship (call it logic, logical act), following which it is possible, in meaning to construct a sentence. In practice, the solutions to their problems, people are relatively easy to cope with the construction of the logical form of the relationship of objects in all its features, in relation to specific acts of action. The accumulated experience allows to build objects of sentences in some logical sequence and relationship. But it always happens intuitively, i.e., the person's subconscious knows how right or wrong to do. But to explain why he does exactly what he was understood or specifically, what he didn't understand (it's still knowledge of how to correctly build a sentence), neither myself nor others often can't. By and large, it is never required. But it is important to realize and actualize this process, try as much as possible in detail to describe it and, whenever possible, to formalize, to be clear, what it is and why the objects (words-concept), how the planets of the solar system line up in this way and not otherwise. Does, or should do, any science, including logic. To do this, first of all, to reveal and to show, first, all the main and preferably not the main objects of sentences (because, so called, is not the main object, by changing a situation can easily turn into basic objects), and, second, to show some features of their relationship. I'm not talking in this case about the logical laws (as in traditional logic), this is a deeper essence.
Post a Comment