Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for lavish wedding from Den Of Geek

Game Of Thrones: behind the scenes at The Red Wedding

Den Of Geek-Feb. 19, 2014
Faced with a mammoth task, HBO has managed to do justice to this lavish, ... specially-commissioned Red Wedding-themed cake created by chocolatier ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

Yet to find his new leading lady! Orlando Bloom goes solo to ...

Daily Mail-Aug. 30, 2014
Orlando Bloom goes solo to lavish Northern Irish wedding of actress Flora ... the wedding ceremony of Flora Montgomery and Soren Jessen on Saturday.
Story image for lavish wedding from NDTV

Arpita Khan's Wedding Concludes With a Farewell Lunch

NDTV-Nov. 20, 2014
Salman Khan's sister Arpita's wedding ceremonies concluded with a farewell lunch ... On November 18, the Bollywood fraternity gathered for the lavish wedding ...
Here's how Jaya Bachchan helped Salman Khan for Arpita's ... (press release) (blog)-Nov. 20, 2014
Story image for lavish wedding from Entertainment Tonight News

Motley Crue's Nikki Sixx Ties the Knot!

Entertainment Tonight News-Mar. 15, 2014
... Courtney Bingham in Los Angeles this weekend, and ET's own Brooke Anderson was one of the invited guests to the lavish wedding! Read on for details.

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

When we talk about the semantic interpretation of sentences, we mean that the meaning is always expressed in some logical form the relationship of the main and not the main objects of the proposals. The logical relationship holds meaning in some logical form (one logical logical education through another education), which allows to understand the content of the proposal. When it is argued that, for example, And there are (S is P), then there shall be a logical sequence and principles of the relationship (call it logic, logical act), following which it is possible, in meaning to construct a sentence.

In practice, the solutions to their problems, people are relatively easy to cope with the construction of the logical form of the relationship of objects in all its features, in relation to specific acts of action. The accumulated experience allows to build objects of sentences in some logical sequence and relationship. But it always happens intuitively, i.e., the person's subconscious knows how right or wrong to do. But to explain why he does exactly what he was understood or specifically, what he didn't understand (it's still knowledge of how to correctly build a sentence), neither myself nor others often can't. By and large, it is never required.

But it is important to realize and actualize this process, try as much as possible in detail to describe it and, whenever possible, to formalize, to be clear, what it is and why the objects (words-concept), how the planets of the solar system line up in this way and not otherwise. Does, or should do, any science, including logic.

To do this, first of all, to reveal and to show, first, all the main and preferably not the main objects of sentences (because, so called, is not the main object, by changing a situation can easily turn into basic objects), and, second, to show some features of their relationship. I'm not talking in this case about the logical laws (as in traditional logic), this is a deeper essence.