Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

You may now kiss the bride: Kristin Cavallari and Jay Cutler ...

Daily Mail-Jun. 12, 2013
The happy couple: Kristin Cavallari and Jay Cutler share a tender moment on their wedding day in a new photo which the reality star shared on Instagram on ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Metro

Katie Price Top 10 fashion disasters: From her over-the-top ...

Metro-Apr. 1, 2013
Katie Price, 34, has wed her third husband, Kieran Hayler, 26, in a lavish 'Willy ... Going classic (but not classy), Price wore a white wedding gown that she had ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

You may kiss the bride... provided you can catch her ...

Daily Mail-Aug. 29, 2013
Weddings are often very personal affairs and when it came time for Cam Auge and Caylee Wasilenko to tie the knot, the daring couple couldn't think of ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

My big fat fake TV wedding? Real Housewives' Adriana De ...

Daily Mail-Aug. 7, 2013
Her and husband Frederic Marq's May wedding ceremony will air during the ... entrepreneur Marq in 2008, five years ahead of their lavish wedding set to air on ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

The concept of dominance is very close to the concept of determinism, but they are unlikely to equate. The notion of dominant ideas phenomenalism and determinism get along very well and resolved the dilemma of free will or hard determinism. Resolves this contradiction with a long philosophical history, is relatively simple: total freedom, but only within the framework of the determinants: the presence of a determinant only when there is total freedom.
This principle is based the syllogism in traditional logic, if a smaller parcel is part of a large, in this case, all the signs of the last automatically switch to a lower package. Or else, a smaller parcel may be included in a big package, only if they have identical characteristics.
The context (from lat. contextus - coupling, Union, relationship) - finished in the sense of a passage of text or speech, within which most accurately and specifically reveals the meaning and value of the individual is included in the words, phrases, combination of phrases. In the logic and methodology of scientific knowledge K. it is understood as a single argument, a fragment of a scientific theory. In addition to the basic semantic value, which has a word or a sentence, taken by themselves, K. gives them added value, moreover, it could significantly change the basic meaning of words and sentences. K. therefore, in different words and sentences can take on different values. Sometimes since entirely gives the meaning of a certain term. In such cases we say about the contextual definition of the term. Question about contextual meaning of the terms attracted wide attention in the methodology of scientific knowledge in connection with the analysis of the development of scientific knowledge, the transition of terms from old theories to new and changing values during such transitions. (See. The dictionary logic).
So, the dominant in society, some ideology, often created special frequency distribution of certain words, which creates an artificial context. Often it is very different from the natural context. For example, the government constantly monitors the frequency distribution of words of a special thesaurus (eg. care about people, about man, etc.). But the analysis of the natural context of the government's actions, may indicate just the opposite - violence and exploitation of his own people, which is very well seen in the whole history of Russia.
By the way, you can logically prove that it is not. If a man lived 120 years, then with high probability, it can be argued that he can live 1 day, 2 days N days. Thus we get the phenomenon of immortality, but only logical. These arguments from the logical paradoxes and conceptual confusions, what we talked about in the footnote just above. This logical construction does not provide for the inevitable qualitative change of the subject, which in principle excludes the N-education.