Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
When the form, in your opinion, ready for when every word and every sentence dozens of times thought out and balanced, the feeling that everything has been done and the best way that perfection is achieved and that it is better to do anything anymore. This is a dangerous feeling often leads to complacency, not urgency, deafness, and even irritation, if your application invokes the observations of other experts.Only after a survey, at the stage of analysis of the primary sociological information, of answers, there is the realization of how much flawed, wrong. So I want to change this or that question, correct phrase. And with a heavy heart, finally, stating that the questionnaire could be much better. Unfortunately, this understanding comes too late.When You think that the questionnaire is ready, take the time to duplicate it. One hundred points to one that you had missed something, something not taken into account, a rule or requirement to make a question or questionnaire is not completed. Take your latest application form, carefully review it, check it out and you will see that some rules in it are not met, something not fully implemented.When the form, in your opinion, are ready, don't give it to the printer, and first show with my colleagues, experts-sociologists and let them impartially evaluate your work. Try to organize the discussion of the questionnaire and how you would not have been unpleasant for the child, try to objectively hear all the comments.Discussion the questionnaire can take place in different ways. The most common method is the workshop of a small group of specialists, no more than five people. As a rule, such a meeting gives a good result, i.e. it is able to fully discuss the research methodology, identify its strengths and weaknesses. But this meeting must be carefully prepared.Discussion can take place both in writing and orally, and each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, regardless of what form of discussion you choose, it must take a certain pattern and in a strict sequence. It is possible to offer such a scheme.-- If software issues a sufficient disclosure in the questionnaire? All survey questions are working on the solution of the tasks? There are no accidental (optional) questions? Is it possible to reduce the total number without compromising solve the problem? What questions should I add?-- Observed whether the principle drama of the questionnaire? Whether there are questions in the questionnaire according to their difficulty, type, character, etc.? As the principle of mutual understanding between researcher and Respondent? Respect for the rules of politeness, correct? Is the questionnaire of interest to respondents as it is attractive, easy to fill? As subjectively perceived by the questionnaire, how long does it take for its completion? What issues are the most difficult to answer?-- If the questions are too General in nature and do not do they influence each other? Observing the rule of temporal certainty? Not too the questionnaire and the questions wordy? Whether in the form of stylistic and semantic mistakes? Not whether the wording of the questions suggestibility?-- How to use control methods to determine the level of awareness of the respondents, the validity and reliability of the information? What type of question is preferable to solve a particular task? Reasonably the number of alternatives in the question? Restrict the use of factual and motivational issues?-- Eligible whether use of contact, buffer, preparatory, introductory issues; the various texts, to switch attention, the delineation of the thematic clusters, to strengthen the confidence of the Respondent in his power to revive memories, to increase the interest, etc.?-- If the Respondent's use of foreign words, special terms, concepts, various abbreviations and acronyms?-- Whether the technical design of the questionnaire, the use of technical signs and signals, use of pictures, images, and coding of the questionnaire and the pre-processing on a computer?
A special role belongs to characters, and in the process of learning. TheirFlorensky says, "the organs of communication with reality." He writes: "Theythrough them we come into contact with what has been cut so far fromour consciousness. The image we see the reality, and name -- hear her;the symbols are the holes punched in our subjectivity. So whatwonder if they are phenomena, we reality do not obey the lawssubjectivity? And wouldn't it have been amazing opposite? The characters are notstacked on the plane of reason, their structure is thoroughly antinomic phenomenon. Butthis antinomy is not an objection against them, but on the contrary-the key to theirof the truth" (Ibid.P. 344).
Post a Comment