Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
When an investigator aims to disclose the fact of the crime, he thereby tries to recreate, to reproduce the facts of the act. He achieves this by analyzing the interpretations of fact, the so-called eyewitnesses. Is a series of funny reactions of the fact that it is very interesting to determine the essence of interpretation.First, interpretation is never and cannot be adequate for the nature of the formation of fact, if you take the interpretation as fact. All of the witnesses, and most immediate, never not adequately describe the fact of committing a crime. Not by chance among the investigators is a widespread joke: lying as a witness.Secondly, some witnesses need to distort the fact. This is also the interpretation that solves its task, often very different from the problems solved by the investigator, but she has a right to exist along with other facts.Thirdly, to follow also conducts interpretation and as a primary fact (the so-called version or edition) and the interpretation of the fact witnesses, i.e. it is interpreting the interpretation.Based on the foregoing, it seems that no one ever could with an absolute guarantee to know what is the original fact, since it dissolves many other facts as to its interpretation. This is not so. The investigator still completes the work docapsis called to the fact, and the truth triumphs, judging by the detective films and books. However, he operaetsmiling on popoversandprovided evidence that speakers fact. When a criminal htorepresent the fingerprints on the dagger, several witnesses confirm thatandthe stethoscope at the crime scene, right to the taboutmu he confessed, that, as a rule, sufficient to transfer the case to the court, and the prosecution demanded the most severe being cleanedonthe thief.
Post a Comment