Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for lavish wedding from Washington Post

Carolyn Hax: Wedding etiquette advice on gift requests, family ...

Washington Post-Feb. 2, 2013
One cousin has been planning a lavish wedding for over a year, and sent out “save the date” cards nine months in advance. Cousin 2 became engaged days ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

lavish eco-hotel, fireworks on the beach and their initials in ...

Daily Mail-Apr. 21, 2013
Alison Moyet sang for the guests in the evening, as did Miss French's daughter Billie, from her marriage to comedian Lenny Henry, which ended three years ago.
Story image for lavish wedding from Hollywood Life

'Teen Mom 2' Star Kailyn Lowry& Javi Marroquin ...

Hollywood Life-Sep. 23, 2013
The two had a lavish ceremony in Camden, New Jersey on Sept. 21. Although Kailyn Lowry ... Are you surprised they had a big, lavish wedding? Let us know!
Lilac, Lace & A Baby Bump! Inside 'Teen Mom' Star Kailyn ...
Highly Cited-Radar Online-Sep. 23, 2013
Story image for lavish wedding from UPI.com (blog)

'My Fair Wedding' divorce: Host David Tutera splitting from ...

UPI.com (blog)-May 1, 2013
As host of WE tv's "My Fair Wedding," David Tutera puts together lavish wedding ceremonies for couples celebrating their commitments to each other. But as ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...


This question is not entirely legitimate in relation to the principle of choice in this case. Those and other numbers are correct, but they reflect the different reality or, rather, several different aspects of the phenomenon under study. In strict limitation when the Respondent chooses one of the most significant alternative, thus is determined by the dominant factor (the lack of housing in new cities quite frequently such a factor in the decision of dismissal from the company and moving to another city). Free choice or a limited choice of poorly allows the Respondent more fully Express a number of important phenomena, and thereby broaden the scope of the phenomenon under study. In these cases, despite the difference in the responses (as a rule, it is small), it is logical to take these alternatives as equal in importance if the objectives of the study require definition of more strict dependence alternatives. We can say that the second and third choices is more soft in comparison with the first, the data interpretation is more legitimate.
Everything said should be taken into consideration in the second type of question when the Respondent is asked to choose not one, but two or three (as is usually done) alternatives.
defining what he called apotential: "each word means something (semantikos), but na any speech is denotative (apophantikos): such is the only one about which we can say true or false. However, this is not always possible: prayer, for example, is speech but it is neither true nor false"