Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for lavish wedding from Business Insider

A Cost Breakdown Of Jessica Simpson's Reported $1.4 ...

Business Insider-Jul. 8, 2014
A Cost Breakdown Of Jessica Simpson's Reported $1.4 Million Wedding ... Jessica Simpson wed longtime boyfriend Eric Johnson in a lavish four-day ceremony ...
Story image for lavish wedding from HipHollywood.com

Palace of Versailles Shuts Down Kanye West, Kim Kardashian ...

HipHollywood.com-Jan. 22, 2014
According to reports, the rapper and Kim Kardashian wanted to throw a lavish wedding at the Palace of Versailles in France. The rumors gained even more ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Vogue.com

What Will Solange Wear on Her Wedding Day? Her Best All ...

Vogue.com-Nov. 12, 2014
It's rumored that Solange Knowles and her longtime boyfriend Alan Ferguson are finally tying the knot this Sunday in New Orleans. No doubt it will be a lavish ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Radar Online

Burning Love! Britney Spears Plans Attention-Grabbing ...

Radar Online-Mar. 13, 2014
Britney Spears plans to marry boyfriend David Lucado and she's already picked out her dream wedding venue — Elvis Presley's famed estate Graceland, ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

In the sentence "all men are mortal, if men are mortal", the first part is set depending on the second, i.e. the expression "all men are mortal" is true only under the condition that "men are mortal". But it must still be proved. Can say differently, "all men are mortal, because humans are mortal". Here is the last becomes the dominant feature of the axiom which defines the first part, or rather the concept of "all". Further, "all men are mortal, if all are mortal," i.e. here questioned that all men are mortal, and perhaps there are people who are immortal. Or "all men are mortal, because men are mortal" - the axiom and the dominant becomes the last. As the conceptual formation of "all men are mortal" may be determined by the conceptual formation of "all men" "all men are mortal, if we are talking about people", the hypothetical dominant or "all men are mortal, because people" are the true dominant.

To avoid confusion in the logical sense of the various conceptual entities, there is the context of what more we will say next. It is important to understand that combinations of the conceptual entities can be endless, which allows each sentence to describe a large number of real phenomena, while using a limited number of physical carriers of meaning, i.e. words.

There is another feature. The sentence "all men are mortal" is a short form of a long series of arguments, each of which performs its function. If you deploy, you get about the following phrase: "all men are mortal, provided that there is no one who would live forever, and it would be proven. And that we are talking only about this man, which has the property "biological entity", which, in turn, has the unique property of "mortality".

If you look closely at this proposal, we will see that there are certain axioms that define a bunch of concepts. If we are interested in the truth of the situation - "all men are mortal", then we have to accept (somehow) as an axiom, that all these objects have the property "biological entity". We must also accept as axiomatic that "biological entity", in turn, has that property, except for all the others, as "mortality".

We also accept the truth that the subject "biological entity", which, in turn, has the property, except for all the others, "mortality" becomes a characteristic or property of these concepts as part of among the many (restricted) other properties. If we accept that "mortality" belongs "biological essence" which becomes a property of the concepts "all", "people" and "mortality", that conceptual education "all men are mortal" is true, but only in the framework of these axioms. Thus, the term "biological entity" becomes the center conceptual design "all men are mortal", which shows, as we promised, below diagram.