Thursday, February 28, 2019

Handmade Silver Rounded Freshwater Pearl Pendant Necklace N6288

2 comments:

Anonymous said...


However, the elaboration of conceptual knowledge meets may occur on the basis or logical reasoning of the questioner and his axioms, or the logic of its reasoning and its axioms, i.e., independent method. If the independent method will be that both came to the same result, can with great confidence say that worked out first asking, and then answering conceptual knowledge correctly.
The ratio of question and answer and question and answer meeting there is a very interesting relationship. When the questioner produces a concept, it already is the process of responding to his own question. Being true to the subject, it remains perhaps the real object and takes the form of a question. Response meet is the answer to your own question ("is it True, the proposed framework?"). A question for the meeting becomes a private matter of the object. For the subject, he again appears in the form of a question. In other words, meet, in order to answer the question, need to develop conceptual knowledge. But as soon as it is developed and takes to himself an affirmative value for the subject, it still becomes a question. In this case, the response to it on the part of the subject will be his new conceptual knowledge. If they converge, then the answer is correct and the concept for both of them becomes objectively significant.
Precisely because they are independent from each other, is the objectification of knowledge and its movement. Only when there are two independent methods, determined by the objective nature of the phenomenon under study that is required for the asking and the answering, and eventually to the development of knowledge.
Thus, the probability of response embedded in the question itself, in its conceptual part and finds expression in a hypothetical part of the question. The answers are basically an expression of this hypothesis and its alternative terms. That is why we say that the answer embedded in the question. But not in itself the answer, otherwise the question would be meaningless, and the answer choices, one of which will be true, true in the sense that the development of the phenomenon under study in its objective expression is fully or mostly consistent with our conceptual ideas about the motion and development.
Once again, the question itself doesn't reveal anything and does not give new knowledge. The only question checks true or false that knowledge that is already produced by a person in a conceptual form. And when in question appear for the alternatives "Yes" or "no", this means that responsible, choosing a particular alternative, thereby confirms or not confirms our conceptual view on the development of the phenomenon under study. If we offer a set of options, and in this case is the principle of confirmation or non-confirmation of the conceptual provisions. We just presented the question in a more complicated form than necessary. But the difficult question is essentially the same dichotomous question, only in compressed form, of which we shall speak.
The answer is it always has an object in development, otherwise we can't know. Another thing is that forms of development can have infinitely diverse expression in various types of objects and in different situations. Until no response is received, no subsequent decisions and actions that mean "no" for the following question. And Vice versa, is not yet formulated, the question can not be and actions may not be the answer.

Anonymous said...


However, the elaboration of conceptual knowledge meets may occur on the basis or logical reasoning of the questioner and his axioms, or the logic of its reasoning and its axioms, i.e., independent method. If the independent method will be that both came to the same result, can with great confidence say that worked out first asking, and then answering conceptual knowledge correctly.
The ratio of question and answer and question and answer meeting there is a very interesting relationship. When the questioner produces a concept, it already is the process of responding to his own question. Being true to the subject, it remains perhaps the real object and takes the form of a question. Response meet is the answer to your own question ("is it True, the proposed framework?"). A question for the meeting becomes a private matter of the object. For the subject, he again appears in the form of a question. In other words, meet, in order to answer the question, need to develop conceptual knowledge. But as soon as it is developed and takes to himself an affirmative value for the subject, it still becomes a question. In this case, the response to it on the part of the subject will be his new conceptual knowledge. If they converge, then the answer is correct and the concept for both of them becomes objectively significant.
Precisely because they are independent from each other, is the objectification of knowledge and its movement. Only when there are two independent methods, determined by the objective nature of the phenomenon under study that is required for the asking and the answering, and eventually to the development of knowledge.
Thus, the probability of response embedded in the question itself, in its conceptual part and finds expression in a hypothetical part of the question. The answers are basically an expression of this hypothesis and its alternative terms. That is why we say that the answer embedded in the question. But not in itself the answer, otherwise the question would be meaningless, and the answer choices, one of which will be true, true in the sense that the development of the phenomenon under study in its objective expression is fully or mostly consistent with our conceptual ideas about the motion and development.
Once again, the question itself doesn't reveal anything and does not give new knowledge. The only question checks true or false that knowledge that is already produced by a person in a conceptual form. And when in question appear for the alternatives "Yes" or "no", this means that responsible, choosing a particular alternative, thereby confirms or not confirms our conceptual view on the development of the phenomenon under study. If we offer a set of options, and in this case is the principle of confirmation or non-confirmation of the conceptual provisions. We just presented the question in a more complicated form than necessary. But the difficult question is essentially the same dichotomous question, only in compressed form, of which we shall speak.
The answer is it always has an object in development, otherwise we can't know. Another thing is that forms of development can have infinitely diverse expression in various types of objects and in different situations. Until no response is received, no subsequent decisions and actions that mean "no" for the following question. And Vice versa, is not yet formulated, the question can not be and actions may not be the answer.