Thursday, December 5, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Refinery29

An Explanation About The Random “Bride” During Couture ...

Refinery29-Jul. 7, 2017
She's usually in a veil and a sweeping, white gown. She might have bridesmaids accompanying her, or a flower child. The looks are sometimes very ...
Story image for iconic gown from Interview

Five iconic looks from the stylist responsible for Lil Kim's ...

Interview-Dec. 14, 2017
Five iconic looks from the stylist responsible for Lil Kim's seashell pastie .... The gold gown and matching jacket was created by Norma Kamali and all the other ...
Story image for iconic gown from

Jennifer Lopez Slays at the 2017 Grammys 12, 2017
In 2000, Jennifer Lopez established a Grammys red carpet legacy when she stepped out in the now-iconic, barely-there green Versace gown. Seventeen years ...
Story image for iconic gown from

The 30 Dresses That Put These Hollywood Stars on the Map 29, 2017
Jolie showed a softer side in a regal St. John chiffon gown while supporting Pitt .... aptly chose an iconic French designer, Jean Paul Gaultier, to design a dress ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

And here arises another interesting point. Empirical knowledge, of course, does not exist outside of empirical fact, for example, as its basis. But the empirical fact is also or can be an indicator of empirical knowledge. It turns out that the fact that, on the one hand, determines the empirical knowledge, on the other hand, points out the existing empirical knowledge and, the third is itself an objective fact.
In fact, if we know that fire is hot, this allows to treat the fire as hot without it every time in practice. Any normal person, in addition to philosophers, knows that fire is hot, that descend from the sixteenth floor of stairs is better, but not through the window, etc. it Turns out that the empirical fact points to a certain empirical knowledge.
However, if you approach the fact as an objective, i.e., existing outside of consciousness, then he cannot point to empirical knowledge as its content, because it's primary. Pure logical reasoning: secondary follows primary and can never be reversible as well as may not be reversible in time.
Any fact if it is reflected in consciousness, if requiredaboutthe need to purchase aasem for some mandnie
In other words, the ratio of fact and empirical knowledge is considered in the framework of causality, causal dependence, which, in turn, is represented by the linear flow of time and therefore irreversible. Accordingly, we cannot say that empirical knowledge determines the content of the fact. And if so, it means that we cannot interpret the facts and to solve their problems. And thus painted themselves into a logical impasse.
But if we agree that empirical fact still points to empirical knowledge, then we must admit that there is something else that mediates empirical fact and empirical knowledge. This third, as we have said, can only be another fact. The mediator between these facts is always some other empirical knowledge, and thus another objective fact. This fact allows us to translate empirical fact empirical knowledge and back, to control or, more precisely, to determine the content of empirical fact in the framework of tasks.
This third fact is our past knowledge.