Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from HELLO! Canada

Princess Diana's wedding dress designer is launching a new ...

HELLO! Canada-Jan. 4, 2018
"It will have the spirit of Emanuel from the days we made dresses some of the most iconic women of the time, like Elizabeth Taylor, Carolina Herrera and Joan ...
Story image for iconic gown from POPSUGAR

Get Us a Time Machine, Because We Need to See Britney ...

POPSUGAR-Nov. 16, 2018
Whether she was posing on the red carpet in a high-end gown, performing on ... From her iconic denim red carpet look at the MTV Video Music Awards to her ...
Story image for iconic gown from

The Duchess of Cambridge's iconic engagement dress is now ... 13, 2018
When the Duchess of Cambridge announced her engagement to Prince William back in 2010, the outfit she chose to wear – a dark blue Issa wrap dress ...
Story image for iconic gown from Artvoice


Artvoice-Jul. 1, 2018
ICONIC ENSEMBLES WORN BY CHER, CAROL BURNETT, RAQUEL WELCH, ... and online at (left to right: gown worn by Carol Burnett, ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

In fact might even be quite indifferent what is the meaning of the text, because the author (and the text certainly has its author), he always puts the meaning which is favorable for him. But to the user it is important to understand how this text could be useful to him personally to solve the problem. And here is where the interpretation of the text, as if it took place, has only one goal: to find something in there that may not on the surface, but can be very beneficial and even necessary.

And, there is formed the space for almost any arbitrary interpretation of the text. By itself, this feature allows you to have a large number of diverse interpretations, so to speak, on all occasions. And there are many examples where the texts are so freely passed that from the basis of practically nothing. Nevertheless, they decided the tasks that were set before them.
t-analysis ormatio and. neobreznoy information. th EXT. private distribution
A favorite method at the same time, as we have already mentioned, the absolute content of one element of the object, transferring its characteristics to the entire set of meanings. But the result of interpretation nothing in common may not be with the object itself, because it fully describes. So, if the content characteristic of "democracy" in the object "power" to transfer the whole object of "power", it can be very a significant distortion of the content of the latter. Because the concept and the object "power" contains lots of other signs, often with the opposite meaning.

Of course, there is such a thing, when the author of the text specifically gives the reader in the seemingly ordinary and understandable to all the material, its hidden meaning. The goal may be one: secretly make in the consciousness of the reader that is necessary to the author, for example, their political agenda or to sell (to sell) something, etc. How professional this uses advertising, politicians, spin doctors, etc. are well known.

Interpretation is a permanent condition of the text, since it is always inscribed in a particular situation. The world is constantly changeable and fickle in its constancy and always in the arbitrarily small period of time, at least a little, but different. This means that fixed text for the user each time has a slightly different content. So, the text was written two thousand years ago, for example, the Bible is treated differently today than in the time of its creation. The most amazing thing that meaning, which today are investing in the texts of the Bible it is believed that this was in the time of its creation. And rarely, rarely try to find its original meaning, although, of course, that make it very difficult.

However, the text does not change, once fixed, he still is. As we have said, the advantage of fixing the text lies in its immutability. But inevitably it turns out that in its original state, it seems as if does not exist, because is constant interpretation, i.e. in some kind of new condition from the very first moment of its appearance. But the so-called original text, as is essentially the interpretation of the preceding events, recorded for example, in consciousness. It turns out that the primary text is only conditionally primary and, accordingly, a primary can be any interpretable text.

And hence the conclusion that in fact the so-called primary or source text just no, there is a constant transformation of life, in this case, text transformation from one state to another, depending on the human decision of the given task. And since the tasks are always changing, there is constant transformation of the previous events as knowledge.

And what man calls the original text, there is recorded knowledge that was somehow important for a person who was kind of a cornerstone laid in the Foundation of many tasks, allowing you to build a new building being. As a test, in particular, is already more than two thousand years the texts that later became known as the Bible.