Thursday, December 5, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from OperaWire

New York Fashion Week 2017: 5 Iconic Fashion Designers ...

OperaWire-Mar. 21, 2017
Designers will show off everything from concept designs, gowns to regular clothing for everyday use. The week may be attended by some of opera's biggest ...
Story image for iconic gown from Daily Mail


Daily Mail-Apr. 7, 2017
The picture of the dress was posted on Tumblr in 2015 by Caitlin McNeill, a 21-year-old aspiring singer from Scotland, after noticing her friends saw different ...
Story image for iconic gown from Hollywood Reporter

Celine Dion's Stylist Explains Her Epic Gown at the Billboard ...

Hollywood Reporter-May 22, 2017
Celine Dion's Stylist Explains Her Epic Gown at the Billboard Music Awards ... by Dion's stylist Law Roach, was a powerful, soon-to-be-iconic style statement.
Story image for iconic gown from

Princess Kate's Stylist Got Married — See Her Stunning Dress ... 1, 2017
Princess Kate's Stylist Got Married — See Her Stunning Dress (Hint: It Looks ... tastes: Her wedding gown had a few striking resemblances to Kate's iconic dress!

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

The construction of the road as the process is determined by the special relationship of the known elements, or facts, which is formed by man. In a typical process, the connection between them are well known and acting as an independent fact, for example, it (the relationship) can be expressed in the project, the construction plan and other documents of the generalizing type. In atypical process, the communication is also determined by consciousness, but then it has a probability or perhaps true character.
In the mediated chain of elements of new Iinis only what people put on their specialbonce in relation to each other in series and pandin parallel. Inandfor the invariants here can be endless. It all depends on what knowledge aboutblady people and what are tasks. Each variation acts as an independent fact, after heth it can be included in another process, which will be one of the FAtotov.
Process specificeis a specialsNoah bond andzerence to the elemntov, or the fact that the imagehaveto be a man.
But in order to apply any option salot of facts together, it is necessary veryonthe well-know properties of facts or be able to submitinthe take a fact as a process with its elements and their specificetion connection between them. In the construction of chain ratioeof the facts used insare not used is not a fact whole, but only its properties. This is a continuation of the same combination of infraredandtion of concepts: the phenomenon and process. The designation of the phenomenon as fact is in fact OVLandCalpe and take his man completely, no matter whose item it yavlIetsya. But knowetion of the phenomenon as the process allows you to just use his elements as factandmi.
The concept of "process" and "phenomenon" existexist only in order to decide whether hepersons inside the fact, or outside it, i.e. inside itandthe Khoi-private paradigm or outside of it. However, the fact that withsnaneem Fitociruits, and about his person is the starting point. The position of the personofcentury in a world of facts (in the physical space-time Comteandnuume or in the evaluation world, defines the contents of fact) each time is marked and therefore Fitociruits in the mind in a certain way, Viragetsmiling in the clear or not very clear terms and understoodandYah. The latter allows to identify the person in mandre poNati. So the phenomenon as a fact describes a person in a situation very OtleyhNoah from that which is fixed by the concept of "process". Accordingly, the required RAspersonal actiotthe Wii.
The symbol Iintion as fact is in fact aboutinladetion and taking it as a whole, nematter whose item it is. But predrepresentation of the phenomenon as the process letIet opereronVAT only its Elements as facts.
If the person is inside the process, the catofwhich consists of a series of facts, pererecathing each other, it has the ability to change the direction of peof retkinia facts. But if the person is in situandtion of a fixed fact, then he has no feasibleonSTI to change it. He takes it as a given, followIis him as an objective phenomenon, with all its laws, not least due to the fact that this is sversening action, i.e. past experience, not having reverse, it is not changeable neither in space nor in time.
The ability to change the direction of flow of fact and thus how to manipulate it, is determined by the fact that in this case, the person operates not by the fact and its elements. A person does not change the paradigm of fact, but only uses it as an element in a different situation. To use means to take the individual properties of fact and include them in another situation. This in turn is possible only if the elements have identical nature in a common paradigm.
It is clear that if there is even a limitandsecured a large number of famous items and limited toaboutthe number of combinations of facts mewaiting for them can be endless. And each such combination represents a new Iintion.