Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Fame10

Most Iconic Red Carpet Dresses Of 2018

Fame10-Nov. 9, 2018
With 2018 wrapping up, it's that time of year where we take a look back at all the memorable fashion and red carpet moments of the year. From the Oscar's to the ...
Story image for iconic gown from E! Online

J.Lo, Britney, Rihanna & More: Which Celeb Has the Most ...

E! Online-Jan. 15, 2018
From Jennifer Lopez's infamous green Versace gown and Rihanna's stunning pink ... So which music star has the most iconic Grammys look of all time?
Story image for iconic gown from Wonderwall

Alexander McQueen's most iconic fashion moments

Wonderwall-Jul. 10, 2018
Alexander McQueen's most iconic fashion moments ... "I still love the dress itself but I should have worn a bra and I should have just had simple beachy hair and ...
Story image for iconic gown from (blog)

25 of Jennifer Lopez's Best Looks of All Time (blog)-Jul. 16, 2018
This might be her most iconic red carpet gown of all time. The place? The Grammy Awards. The designer? Versace. The Internet in 2000? BROKEN over this ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Natural history will be well
constructed language only if the game is finished if
descriptive accuracy makes any proposal for a permanent
section real (always if the presentation can be attributed to the
that it to isolate) and if the designation of each being with a full
the right pointing to his place in the universal disposition
the whole. In the language of the universal blank is a function of
of the verb; it requires only that the General form of the sentence,
in which the names take into effect his system of articulation.
Natural history pereprobyval these two functions in
unity of the structure, solenaya all the variables that can
to be assigned to one person. While in the language
designation in their individual operation is available
random derivations, giving them the breadth and scope of the
the common names, characteristic as it establishes a natural
history allows you to simultaneously celebrate the individual and place it in the
some space groups, which are connected to each
other. Thus, on top of regular words (and through them,
because they should be used for the initial descriptions)
the building of language of second order, which finally ruled
the exact Names of things: "the Method, the soul of science, at first glance
masking any natural body so that this body expresses
his own name, and that name entails all the knowledge of
body, thus named, which could be achieved in
the passage of time; in extreme chaos opens up a sovereign right
of nature,"<$FL i n n e. Systema naturae, 1776, p. 13.>.
However, this is a significant naming-the transition from
visible structure to the taxonomic basis -- is associated with hard
enforceable requirement. In order to implement and complete
figure, going from monotonous function of the verb "to be" for the derivation and
the coverage of rhetorical space, spontaneous language needs
only in the imagination, that is, the game direct similarities.
On the contrary, in order for taxonomy to be possible, you need to
nature was indeed continuous in all its fullness. There
where language required the similarity of impressions, classification requires
the principle of the smallest possible differences between things. This
continuum arising thus in the depth of naming, in
the gap between the description and disposition of things: it is assumed
long before language and how its condition.