Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Refinery29

All Of Jennifer Lopez's Most Iconic Fashion Moments

Refinery29-Jul. 24, 2019
The superstar has flawlessly mastered the art of the glitzy gown, and she has the red ... Ahead, we reflect back on some of her most iconic fashion moments.
Story image for iconic gown from Harper's BAZAAR

The Fashion Halloween Costumes To Channel For 2019

Harper's BAZAAR-Oct. 16, 2019
In 2000, Jennifer Lopez wore a scandalous Versace gown that led to the ... plenty of partygoers will try to embody the iconic dress for Halloween—and if you like ...
Story image for iconic gown from TownandCountrymag.com

Rare Sketches of Princess Diana's Iconic Wardrobe Go on ...

TownandCountrymag.com-Feb. 19, 2019
The eight intricate sketches by David Sassoon include designs for the going away outfit that the princess wore after her 1981 wedding, a maternity dress she ...
Story image for iconic gown from EW.com

Every RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 runway look so far ...

EW.com-Mar. 12, 2019
... that's worse than, say, making the wrong kind of impression in a now-iconic, unfinished gown covered in sponges (here's looking at you, Monét X Change).

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

the exchange is preceded by
only that -- abundant or rare -- a reality that
delivers nature; only a request for one and refusing the other forces
to cause costs. So, the purpose of the exchanges is to
the distribution of surplus so that they were distributed
among those who are in need. Therefore, they are
"wealth" only temporarily, until, being present in one and
absent from the other, they start and pass the path that
leading them to consumers, restores their original nature
benefits. "The purpose of the exchange, says Mercier de La Riviere, - there is
the use, the consumption, so that trade is fashionable as a whole
defined as the exchange of useful things, leading to their
distribution among their users"
As you see, these two
interpretation of parts known to us the controversial issue:
parts of what is called "psychological theory" of Condillac,
The Galiani, Galena, and the theory of the physiocrats (Quesnay with his school).
The movement of the physiocrats, of course, has the value
he was assigned by economists in the early nineteenth century, when they
regarded it as the Foundation of political economy, but
it would be equally incorrect to attribute this role, as did
marginality, "psychological school". Between these two
methods of analysis there are no other differences other differences
the starting point and direction selected to reach both
instances of the same network, you need connections.
According to the physiocrats, the possibility of sharing necessary for
the fact that there is value and wealth: it is necessary
to have a surplus of products, which requires
other. The fruit I want to eat, which I tear off and eat it
the benefit provided to me by nature; wealth will be available only
in that case, if the fruit on my tree long enough
to exceed my appetite. Besides, we need to
the other was hungry and asked for fruit from me. "The air that we
breathe, says Quesnay, -- the water that we draw in the river, and all
other benefits and resources that are in abundance and
given all the people that are excluded from trade relations:
good, but not wealth"