tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post8486220314401456420..comments2024-01-16T07:07:11.166-08:00Comments on Bridal Pearl Necklace : Wedding Pearl Jewelry: Pearl Necklacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-63061913669292890202019-12-19T10:43:42.825-08:002019-12-19T10:43:42.825-08:00I would like to return to the question of religiou...I would like to return to the question of religious exegesis. Why don't you<br />say about its value? There is another thing that, in my opinion,<br />we must not forget: the history of translation. Every translator of the Bible says<br />himself that he sets forth divine truth, and therefore must<br />to vydayut in the translation of infinite meanings. With time translations<br />changed, and through this evolution it is possible to find something... But it's very<br />a difficult question.<br /> One more question. I was thinking about possible relationships<br />between Nietzsche and Freud. Neither the works of Freud, nor in the book of Jones,<br />you will find almost nothing about it. Then I said to myself: "Maybe<br />the problem is the opposite: why Freud was silent about Nietzsche?"<br /> There are two aspects. First, in 1908, the disciples of Freud, Rank, and<br />Adler, conducted a small seminar on the theme of similarity or<br />the analogies between Nietzsche's ideas (particularly his "Genealogy of morality") and<br />the ideas of Freud. Freud treated this very cautiously, giving them<br />to act at its own discretion, and I domay that he could say<br />for this reason like this: "Nietzsche introduces too many ideas<br />at the same time".<br /> Second, beginning in 1910, Freud had a relationship with Lou<br />Salomé 4). He certainly tried to hold her didactic analysis.<br />Therefore, we can talk about his kind of therapeutic relationship<br />between Freud and Nietzsche, the attitude, mediated by Lou salomé. Therefore, Freud<br />and could not to talk about it. But, of course, all that Lou salomé later<br />published, belongs in the basis for this is not a limited<br />the time analysis. It should be read in this perspective.<br />In addition, in the book of Freud "Moses and monotheism", you can see a kind of<br />dialogue with the "Genealogy of morality". You see, I offer you a problem.<br />Do You know anything about this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6294744150606571617.post-51711304632217482832019-12-15T01:01:12.751-08:002019-12-15T01:01:12.751-08:00what society can learn about the needs that it tak...what society can learn about the needs that it takes in the current state, only from their technological environment. For fundamental science it is characteristic to access unknown properties, which can change the model of the technological environment and to create unforeseen needs. He cites the example of the use of solid materials for strengthening and development of the physics of solids. Such a "negative adjustment" of social interactions and needs in the modern technical object criticized R. Jolena (Jaulin R. Le mythe technologique // Revue de l'entreprise. <br />Pearl Necklacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01857152720762307589noreply@blogger.com