Sunday, December 1, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from

Princess Beatrice Is Wearing Purple Fit for a Queen on the Met ... 7, 2018
At this point, it's unclear who the designers of the dress or any of Beatrice's accessories are, but we'll be ... This is Princess Beatrice's first time at the iconic event.
Story image for iconic gown from

30 of the Most Memorable Fashion Moments of All Time 26, 2018
The skin-tight sequined gown the star wore to serenade John F. Kennedy at a 1962 gala ... Leave it up to Bob Mackie to make sequins and mesh instantly iconic.
Story image for iconic gown from

Meghan Markle's Wedding Dress Is Going to Headline a ... 20, 2018
And, okay, it might not be possible to wear the Givenchy gown for yourself on your own big day, but you are now one step closer to the fairytale. Meghan's iconic ...
Story image for iconic gown from Women's Health

The 30 Most Amazing Celebrity Wedding Dresses Of All Time

Women's Health-Sep. 20, 2018
One of the most iconic and elegant bridal gowns of all time, Grace Kelly's dress was so influential that even Kate Middleton reportedly took inspiration from it.

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

But it is clear that the word, or rather its contents, does not exist of itself and never existed as such. Formed as the result of a complex combination of phenomena, it makes sense only in the aggregate of surrounding phenomena. The word itself has its certain contents only in the position condition, when the word described the situation for some time, remains stable and constant. In this case, the content of the word remains understandable and worth it to say, as soon as it becomes clear what the situation it reflects, describes.

But in the position relationship when the situation becomes specific when a violation of parity in the interaction of actors, the word also loses its well-defined content. But since the word always has its content, without this it does not exist, a situation the relationship loses its rigor. This means that the previous content of the word is not very accurate. But since the external situation never changes radically, it is always frontier, and the content of the word often becomes the edge with the other contents of the same or different words.

But without fail it makes sense in the context of other words, that means in the context of other phenomena. With this approach, the word itself seems to not exist. But it is not, it exists, but in a more General context, when it reflects a stable existence. ie state. But in this as in the changed circumstances, it no longer solves the task, i.e. does not describe a new situation, at least completely. In this case, it must be correlated with other words (usually not more than three or five in his immediate surroundings). And only in this case becomes the true content, i.e. content that adequately describes the new situation.

The structure of the word as an object has three components: two constants and one variable. 1. The word, as the letters, has a constant value. It is always spelled the same, at least in modern Russian language. 2. But the content of the word is a variable. So the word man in the Russian language is written is always the same, but the content is so plural that doesn't even transfer. And the only situation that forms the context to determine its content and then not completely.