Saturday, December 7, 2019

Story image for bridesmaids from Globalnews.ca

Millennials are cutting out this popular wedding element

Globalnews.ca-Apr. 18, 2017
“It's a great gesture to help pay for your bridesmaids' hair, makeup and/or their dresses. It can cost a lot of time and money to be a bridesmaid, and it goes a long ...
Story image for bridesmaids from OK Magazine

Kirsten Dunst & Other Celebrities Who Played Bridesmaids ...

OK Magazine-Oct. 3, 2017
Kirsten Dunst is the latest celebrity to play bridesmaid to their friend this past year! She headed all the way to Rome to be there for her bestie Cindy McGee as ...



Story image for bridesmaids from StyleCaster

18 Celebs Who Were Bridesmaids to Us Regular 'Ole Plebs

StyleCaster-May 26, 2017
But what happens when, say, you have Taylor Swift, Rihanna or Hailey Baldwin in your squad? You have to ask them to be a bridesmaid—or risk them leaving ...
Story image for bridesmaids from YourTango

Bridesmaid Reveal Parties Are A New Trend And We're ...

YourTango-Jan. 23, 2017
Really? REALLY? If you listened to the wedding industry, you'd believe that the money you spent on a wedding would directly equate to the happiness of the ...

2 comments:

Pearl Necklace said...

We consider two basic types of legitimation story - one more political, the other more philosophical, but both are of great importance for modern history, particularly the history of knowledge and its institutions.

Method of legitimation, we're talking about, re-enters the story as a form of justification of knowledge and, as such, can act in two ways, depending on whether it is the subject of the story as a cognitive or as practical as a hero of knowledge or a hero of liberty. Because of the existence of this alternative, legitimation not only has always the same meaning, but the story itself seems insufficient to give it the finished look.

Anonymous said...

G. Shpet was one of the first used in the Russian literature the term
semiotics, what we talked about above. His interest in this issue
also grows from the history of the attempts to objectify the historical
tools, to make of history an exact science. In his work "the History
the subject of logic" (written in 1917 and published in 1922, pereezd. in
collection "history of philosophy Yearbook 88". Moscow, 1988), he wrote: "History as
science knows only one source of knowledge -- the word. The word is
the form under which the historian finds the contents of reality,
the subject of his scientific knowledge, and the word is the signfrom
which the historian comes to his subject with its specific content,
the components of the value or meaning of the sign" (Pp. 302-303). As you can see, all
the key concepts of semiotics have already been allocated G. Shpet in this
passage. And then he writes, defining historical material as a fundamentally
communication: "the naturalist reads his own not yet written
work, and the historian -- recorded and generally passed the other" (P. 304).