Thursday, December 5, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Bustle

13 Iconic '90s Fashion Moments That Every Kid From The Era ...

Bustle-Mar. 5, 2016
The most iconic '90s fashion moments you'll always remember were also some of the ... This particular photo features Ginger's iconic red satin dress that was ...
Story image for iconic gown from Refinery29

30 Photos Of Jackie O. From The Early Days Of American ...

Refinery29-Dec. 16, 2016
If ever there were a more iconic and stylish first lady than Michelle Obama, it was ... Onassis married John F. Kennedy in a ball-skirted, cap sleeve gown by ...
Story image for iconic gown from (blog)

Whatever Happened to Marilyn Monroe's Famous White Dress? (blog)-Apr. 21, 2016
As far as the dress goes, designer William Travilla created the costume for the star ... have the Ascot number, but she did, in fact, own Marilyn's iconic costume.
Story image for iconic gown from (blog)

How to Copy Carolyn Bessette Kennedy's Iconic Style (blog)-Sep. 2, 2016
Gown: Gabriela Hearst, Clutch: Mansur Gavriel, 10 of 14. image. Getty Images. Carolyne Bessette-Kennedy and husband JFK ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

If we agree that the objective determines the subjective, obscure the process of their interaction.
We think the resolution of this contradiction lies in a plane. Otherwise it is necessary to provide a mechanism of interaction of consciousness and the objective world. The first step in this direction-the rejection of a fundamental principle of absoluteness of the concepts of primary and secondary.
The universality of the world as an objective is determined by the fact that it always exists because the set of its actors. Because actors are always a lot and they always are, there is a huge variety of action essentially creates a constant field, which is valid for each individual subject. The existence of the field is almost independent (depends hypothetically) the availability and actions of each individual subject. But as long as the subject is valid, the field defines its action in the framework of some parameters, that's why he was seen as the primary element on the subject. It was determined that the truth and the primacy of the subject.
But the action of any entity of the nature of the field with respect to the plurality of action performs a single act of. In this regard, the subject can not exist permanently. The lifespan is always limited internal resources. In other words: nature is endless and always alive, the subject is always finite and thus limited. Essentially two different subject matter ¡limited action of the individual subject and the set of actions of the subjects ¡responsible for the existence of each other. It is the limb of the subject defines, or determines, the existence of other actors and the multiplicity of their actions. The latter in turn determines the field of life of every subject.
Due to the limited lifetime of the entity has a relative independence and shall enter into specific relations with the subjects of nature, forming a lot of as equals. In possible ¡with all the field of action, represented by the subjects of his immediate environment. Because of this relationship between the so-called objective reality and the subject, or consciousness, take on a special character. In part of our discussion on the primary and secondary we recognise that the nature of the primary, but only in the time of the birth or education of the subject. Further, the subject gains autonomy and enters into a relationship with nature as equal subject.
Thus, the problem of primacy of consciousness or existence relative to each other, of course, exist. But, in our opinion, there is no absolute and total primacy of existence in relation to consciousness, as consciousness in relation to existence. There is only the absoluteness of the principle of the primacy. In our opinion, not an absolute and total primary and secondary determine the mechanism of interaction of subjective and objective for the solution of some tasks and development of the matter at all.