Thursday, December 5, 2019

Story image for iconic gown from Bustle

11 Most Iconic Celebrity Outfits Of The 2000s — PHOTOS

Bustle-Jun. 16, 2016
Enter the most iconic celebrity outfits of the 2000s — from outrageous meat dresses to noughties-centric dress numbers that will throw us back into those Y2K ...
Story image for iconic gown from Vanity Fair

Gigi Hadid Channels Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake's ...

Vanity Fair-Sep. 21, 2016
Gigi Hadid Channels Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake's Iconic Denim Look ... Back in 2014, Katy Perry wore her own custom Versace version of the dress ...
Story image for iconic gown from Vanity Fair

Tour the Shop Where Hollywood's Most Iconic Costumes Go ...

Vanity Fair-Oct. 27, 2016
Tour the Shop Where Hollywood's Most Iconic Costumes Go to Retire .... Gone with the Wind gown to one of Jack Nicholson's iconic Chinatown suits.
Story image for iconic gown from TeenVogue.com

The 10 Most Iconic Grammys Looks of All Time

TeenVogue.com-Feb. 14, 2016
Okay, this wouldn't be an iconic Grammys slideshow without Mother Monster! Stepping out with bright yellow hair and a custom Giorgio Armani gown, Gaga ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Quite simply it is possible to prove the existence of PRonprocess identification. Each of us hundreds of times to passonDIL at the familiar streets of the big and noisy city, N.asan example, Moscow. When we walk down the street through the crowd of people, quietly talking with a friend, we obrusandis called flow, a barrage of diverse information. But we feel in this SCVandLe are quite comfortable, nothing that we don't care just because withsknowledge calmly and confidently identificeret incoming andninformation and transmits it as standard. But if there is something unusual (there is a new retolamna poster, squeal of brakes, a scream or sound signal mandtires, unusual wear or something else), we immediately react to this information. This STPanddenotes that consciousness identificaraboutValo received quanta of information with the existing images of being and requires VMEsandment of another part of the consciousness for their identification or for determination of the psbut them.
This is one of the fundamental considerations in the description of the identification process incoming information.
2.
It is crucial: as evidence for consciousness are only the phenomena which are conscious. Regardless of how they fell in consciousness, it operates them only if they become his property. Themselves forms of matter exist independently of consciousness, but consciousness remains as their cast. It turns out that this form of matter as if divided into two: one exists in the mind of a man, the other ¡so to speak, in objective form. Although it is clear that both forms exist objectively, but only in different guises. Such a division can be potential infinite. Any particular form of matter can be assigned to the consciousness of the infinite number of times, taking new forms in the solution of various tasks. This is the inexhaustibility of matter.
Thus consciousness performs one of the most important functions: it performs the identification of incoming information about those images, forms of existence that are past knowledge.
However, this approach still does not allow a full and clear understanding of the mechanism of interaction of facts in mind, in particular, the relationship between the concepts of subjective and objective fact. Even if we completely agree that the fact that ¡is always tested, proven knowledge, we have no right to abandon the concept of "objective fact" and to use only the concept of "subjective fact". In this case, both the concept just makes no sense.
But as soon as we drive the concept of "objective fact", you confirm that apart from consciousness there is something else. This can be the objective world, which is the Foundation of consciousness and knowledge, at least in opportunity. But if the world of facts mandatory exists in the mind, then we need to talk about the existence of objective and subjective knowledge of the world.
That is why before a person has a question about the essence and nature of knowledge of the world and thatsknowledge has allowedandet: objective or your own, subjectinth world.