Royal Wedding: Our Fashion Police weigh in on The Dress ...
National Post (blog)-Apr. 29, 2011
Wedding? What wedding? We asked Canadian designers to weigh in on the pomp, plumage and finery of the guests and on Kate Middleton's – oops, now the ...
First the Great Unveiling... and then a collective gasp: With a ...
In-Depth-Daily Mail-Apr. 29, 2011
In-Depth-Daily Mail-Apr. 29, 2011
Royal wedding: tea towels will be allowed
Telegraph.co.uk-Jan. 10, 2011
The decision comes after a ruling last month, which laid down what was acceptable as Royal Wedding memorabilia and what would be deemed by the Palace ...
Sarah Ferguson Opens Up About Royal Wedding Rejection ...
ABC News-May 11, 2011
Fergie fled the U.K. for the jungles of Thailand to soothe the sting of her royal wedding snub. It was "difficult" not to be invited to last month's wedding of Prince ...
'It was so difficult': Fergie reveals her hurt over Royal Wedding ...
Highly Cited-Daily Mail-May 11, 2011
Highly Cited-Daily Mail-May 11, 2011
Sarah Ferguson tells Oprah not being invited to royal wedding ...
Blog-Washington Post (blog)-May 10, 2011
Blog-Washington Post (blog)-May 10, 2011
1 comment:
A classical order of language has now closed in on itself.
It lost its transparency and its major function in the field
knowledge. In the XVII and XVIII centuries, the language represented
immediate and spontaneous deployment of the views:
it is in the language they received their first signs, delineates
and regrouped their common features, have established relationships
identity or affiliation; the language was knowledge, and knowledge with
full right was the discourse. Thus, in relation to
any knowledge of the language has occupied a key position: it is only through his
through it was possible to know things in the world. It was not
because language in the Renaissance, has been a part of the world in
single ontological intertwining, but because he was the first
outline some kind of an order in representations of the world, because he
was the primary and inevitable way to present the submission.
That language was formed every generalization: classic
the knowledge was deeply nominalistically. On the contrary, since the nineteenth
century the language is closed in on itself, becomes its own
density, deploys its own history, its own laws and
objectivity. He became the object of knowledge, along with other
-- objects and living beings, wealth and value, with
history of events and people. Perhaps there are some
specific terms, however, any analysis of the language yoren on that
same level as any other empirical analysis
knowledge. Those privileges, which allowed the once universal
the grammar to be both also and logic, crossing to her,
was now abolished. To know the language no longer means now
to approach the knowledge as such; it only means to apply
General methods of knowledge in a particular subject area.
Post a Comment