Thursday, November 28, 2019

Story image for lavish wedding from Entertainment Tonight

EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS: Inside Vanessa Williams' Lavish ...

Entertainment Tonight-Jul. 6, 2015
Actress Vanessa Williams tied the knot with fiance Jim Skrip in an elegant Fourth of July wedding in front of friends and family -- and ET has a look inside the ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Daily Mail

Indian millionaire's son marries in huge £14 million three-day ...

Daily Mail-Nov. 27, 2015
An Indian millionaire has splashed out £14million on the lavish wedding of his son ... their three-day Indian wedding ceremony held in the Italian city of Florence.
Story image for lavish wedding from POPSUGAR

Beyoncé and Solange Support Mom Tina Knowles at Her ...

POPSUGAR-Apr. 13, 2015
It's official: Beyoncé's mom is no longer a single lady. Last week, Tina Knowles married actor Richard Lawson in a lavish wedding aboard a yacht in Newport ...
Story image for lavish wedding from Racked

Go Inside Nicky Hilton's Lavish Wedding

Racked-Jul. 13, 2015
Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

But there is one hitch. To observe unity of place, time and action is possible only in the framework of a common task. But in turn, the task is also an expression of the principle of the unity of place, time and action. Again, there is a logical impasse: without adhering to one another cannot, and Vice versa. In fact, if the young man decided to marry, then all his actions he subordinates this task, and success in the way of its solution lies in the principle of the unity of place, time and action.
Whatever activity the person was engaged, the resolution of this conflict is relatively simple. Always any community action mandatory fits into a more General attitude (action) system that performs a common task. The General problem, if it exists, is already speaking of the unity of place, time and action. And that it is subject to private or smaller level of generality of human actions. So, marriage for a man are a common problem, which solved particular problems. But this common task has its own large community, for example the continuation of the species upon which solved all actions including marriage, and marriage.
The person always operates to solve some tasks. But the activity is reduced to set of solved problems. No act is not possible if you have not made other necessary acts. In this regard, the activity is always considered as a process and a task ¡as a result of this process. At the same time, it is clear that any process contains a series of specially interconnected results. But because the result is either there or it is not, it turns out that the action is almost impossible, and hence impossible and the result. Here's a logical confusion arises on the basis of true premises.
In fact, no confusion there. People define names some phenomena depending on what task or part of it addresses this phenomenon. People have reported the activity as a process to describe a circle of accomplished results, which together give the desired result, which is called "task". It turns out that the task and the activity is almost the same thing, only called by different names. In fact, any activity can be carried out only if there is a decision of private tasks within this activity. But any activity can take place only in the framework of a more General attitude problem, which determines the nature, direction, and nature activities. It is a vicious logical circle.
The resolution of this logical contradiction is to change the content of the concept. What is called activity, is a kind of linearly arranged discrete set of particular actions having the nature of causal dependencies. But due to the fact that this path is discrete, it is possible to direct it in any direction. It is clear that in this task, all human actions are deterministic, i.e., subordinate to this task only. The external evaluation activities also take place only with respect to this problem.
So, if a young person is not able to meet you in the subway with a pretty girl, he begins first and foremost with the meditation about what he did wrong and how to do otherwise. He can come to the decision that metro is not the most convenient place for travelers, especially in the morning or evening. Then he will change the place of meeting and going to the disco. But he could come to the opinion that it is not necessary to get acquainted with the beautiful and very smart girls, then he decides to change the situation and to get acquainted with the not very fastidious girl. But the young man may think that he just doesn't know how to approach properly to the girl, and he had to change approaches. In this case, he changes his conceptual understanding of how external situation.