Saturday, November 23, 2019

Story image for royal wedding from CNN International

The royal wedding: What not to wear!

CNN International-Apr. 9, 2011
(CNN) -- If you're among the 1,900 or so high society bigwigs, politicians and royals who've received an invitation to the most anticipated wedding of the decade, ...

Story image for royal wedding from CNN International

Princess Beatrice's royal wedding hat being sold for charity

CNN International-May 15, 2011
London (CNN) -- Is it a bird? A bow? A pretzel? The hat worn by Britain's Princess Beatrice to last month's royal wedding created a stir, spawning numerous blog ...
Story image for royal wedding from CNN

Kate's royal wedding dress goes on show

CNN-Jul. 22, 2011
London (CNN) -- The intricate lace and embroidery of Catherine Middleton's wedding dress wowed millions as they watched her walk down the aisle with Prince ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

Theory basics
opposed to the theory of symbols as words-it's
a certain linguistic personality, available to isolation
within the group languages and which serves primarily the core verb
forms, whereas the root, discarding the language directly to
nature, to the cry, is only a sound in
endless his transformations is to dismember things on
names. Similarly, the study of the internal variations of language
opposed to the theory of sokrascheniya views: it
determined words, separating them from each other and connecting them with
content that they could identify; marschlande language
was only a visual analysis of the submission. Now words
characterized primarily by their morphology and by the totality of
changes, which may be subject to the audio side of each
of them. Finally and above all, the internal analysis of language
opposes the primacy of the verb "to be", which
attributed to it in classical thinking. The verb reigned in
language, as he was a certain initial connection between
words and because it possessed the important ability for approval it
to celebrate the beginning of language, expressed its specificity, firmly bound him
with the forms of thought. In contrast, the independent analysis of grammatical
structures in practice since the nineteenth century, isolates language, treats it
as an Autonomous formation, breaking its connection with the judgment,
the attributiveness and approval. Thus turns out to be broken
the ontological transition between "speak" and "think"
provided by the verb "to be" and the language immediately becomes a
independent existence, and that existence includes escape them