Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
And at the end of the Chapter regarding the features of this animal Darwinsays: "continued use of all these parts, and inheritanceof modifications occurring to a great extent have determined the coordinationmentioned parts." Note that, in all probability, is mostlyway to raised the massiveness of the lower part of the neck; increased size andthe strength of the chest was caused by the need to support increasedheaviness, increase in the fortress of the front legs was caused by the needto support the increased weight of the neck and chest. But now II see that further analysis is the confidence that describedchanges must be much more numerous and more separated,than it seemed before, and that most of these changes haveto be attributed not to the selection of favorable variations, and exceptionallythe inherited effect of functional modifications. Who has ever seengalloping giraffe, that long will remember this picture because it's sofunny. The reason for the strange movements of the giraffes is clear. Although the front and rear legsgiraffes are very different from each other in length, but when running animalthey move together and do the same steps. As a result of this, wheneach step angle, which describes the back leg around its center,much greater than the angle described by the front leg. Therefore, in order toto equalize the steps, the back of the body strongly podymaetsja down and forward. Hereit looks like the rear half of the body takes almost all the work.Observation shows that the bones and muscles that comprise the back of the bodythe giraffe, perform actions different from the actions of homologousbones and muscles of the animal, with an ordinary ratio, andalso excellent and from the actions of those animals that systematicthe stairs are preceded by a giraffe.
Now I turn to self-defense against the false interpretations, which are veryprobably will be focused on the above arguments, particularly from thethose who read the very article to which I object. Of the theses exposedMr. Martino in his article, it follows that all who defend the hypothesisthe opposite of his own, imagining that solved the mystery of things, iffound natural the cause of the evolution of Mr. Martino, apparently, andis their opponents that they are interpreting all the properties of matter andmotion, reject any further explanations. But this is incorrect. Teachingevolution in a purely scientific form, does not contain materialism, although itopponents strongly represent the matter in such form And inthe thing is, some of my friends among the followers of this doctrine say aboutthe materialism of Buchner and his school with no less contempt than Martino.To show how non-materialistic my own views, to bemaybe it would be appropriate to quote a few excerpts from what I wrote earlieron this issue. "Although the two difficulties, it seems much easier to translate sothe substance on the so-called spirit than to translate so-called spiritthe so-called substance, the latter is completely impossiblehowever, no translation is unable to lead us beyond ourcharacters"
Post a Comment