To fully understand how this evidence leads us to recognition of the influence of the medium as a primordial factor, we need only try to consider these facts in addition to his influence. Suppose for example, the structure of the epidermis is wholly determined by natural selection favorable changes, what shall we say then concerning the above fact that changes in the cellular structure of the mucosa, exposed to air, changes in the cellular structure of the skin? We I must say though mucosa have a highly developed individual of the body and thus proves the powerful effect of environment on its the surface, however, we should not assume that the environment had the action is able to produce such a cellular structure on surfaces primitive forms, though they were still undifferentiated, or if we let's say that such an action was made on them, we should not to assume that it is become hereditary, in Other words, we should to assume that such action or did not exist at all, or that it it was fleeting and left no trace, although it was repeated for a million million generations. We are left to conclude that this skin the structure arose only due to the appearance of spontaneous, caused by not physical conditions (although quite similar to those occur from physical causes) changes, taken up and enlarged natural selection. Does anyone possible to defend such statement?
1 comment:
To fully understand how this evidence leads us to
recognition of the influence of the medium as a primordial factor, we need
only try to consider these facts in addition to his influence. Suppose
for example, the structure of the epidermis is wholly determined by natural selection
favorable changes, what shall we say then concerning
the above fact that changes in the cellular structure of the mucosa,
exposed to air, changes in the cellular structure of the skin? We
I must say though mucosa have a highly developed individual
of the body and thus proves the powerful effect of environment on its
the surface, however, we should not assume that the environment had
the action is able to produce such a cellular structure on surfaces
primitive forms, though they were still undifferentiated, or if we
let's say that such an action was made on them, we should not
to assume that it is become hereditary, in Other words, we should
to assume that such action or did not exist at all, or that it
it was fleeting and left no trace, although it was repeated for
a million million generations. We are left to conclude that this skin
the structure arose only due to the appearance of spontaneous, caused by
not physical conditions (although quite similar to those
occur from physical causes) changes, taken up and enlarged
natural selection. Does anyone possible to defend such
statement?
Post a Comment