Saturday, March 30, 2019

Story image for luxury, pearl necklace from Pensacola News Journal

Fashion: Valentine's Day & Night done right

Pensacola News Journal-Jan. 29, 2016
Venture boldly into the color spectrum! And what color says February more than the color wheel queen red? Red sizzles year-round but after a post-holiday ...
Story image for luxury, pearl necklace from Forbes

The Best Jewels Of The 2016 Met Gala

Forbes-May 4, 2016
... 2.79carats of diamonds set in 18k white gold from the luxury brand's “Green ... Katy Perry in Victorian yellow gold and diamond floral motif pendant earrings, and a ... 19th Century diamond rivière with a jewel encrusted natural baroque pearl, ...
Story image for luxury, pearl necklace from Telegraph.co.uk

The best affordable designer jewellery to buy now - but which suits ...

Telegraph.co.uk-Oct. 8, 2016
You'd think Coco Chanel invented pearls, so closely aligned is the designer with her trademark necklaces. It's no surprise, then, that the French luxury house's ...
Story image for luxury, pearl necklace from Telegraph.co.uk

"Wintour is coming:" Watch Anna Wintour's stand-up comedy routine

Telegraph.co.uk-Jun. 16, 2016
... in One Trade Centre, wearing her signature Vogue uniform- a floral fitted dress, black-out sunglasses, a pearl necklace and a coffee cup bigger than her head.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Test based on the test V. S. Avanesov "Test of satisfaction of construction workers to predict turnover", was developed by the author of the present work to predict the stress among masters of one of the Moscow plant. The task was to determine the number of artists who were dissatisfied with the job and could quit. It was important to find out from the point of view of the probability of occurrence of emergency because of job dissatisfaction and, as a consequence, the decline in demands, most likely unconsciously, to the safety of the workers. The results of the study were as follows: of the 98 respondents of the masters 9 people, according to our data, showed high level of dissatisfaction with the job and was soon to retire. Something like this happened: seven of the nine during the year left the company, and two were transferred to other work not related to direct supervision people. The level of activity of these masters was quite low. As you can see, the test proved to be reliable.
A feature of sociological tests, as well, and other social methods is that, using the same indicators of similar value, it is possible to remove the various social characteristics of the person. So, test flow, by targeting a dismissal allows you to remove the information and the level of satisfaction (dissatisfaction) work. To remove this information by using a method of attributing important criteria or weights used for each indicator.
Usually when you build or test sociological sociological questionnaires to identify particular social characteristics built its own system of indicators for each of them. With a large number of the studied characteristics, as in sociological questionnaires, it is difficult to write each system of indicators, which are typed quite a lot. The result is a complex and cumbersome questionnaire. But this can be avoided if you build some common system of indicators to describe different but similar social characteristics, with different values. In life in the description of those or other phenomena, we use a relatively limited number of indicators, but due to the fact that every time we use them in different meanings, you can describe almost infinite set of all possible situations. Relative, of course, many, since any infinite eventually comes down to a limited set, due to weight restrictions.
As already mentioned, dissatisfaction with labor and installation person for dismissal describes almost the same indicators but with different weighting values. In fact, not everyone who's not satisfied with his work, necessarily dismissed as not all resignations are not fully satisfied with their jobs. And all this is reflected in the same sociological or test questionnaire, with the same performance, and the only difference is a different key to each remove social characteristics.
Sociological disadvantage of the test is that it does not explain what caused one or another social phenomenon, for example, satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the marriage that affected the change in social attitudes in a relationship are studied. The test only States the situation, gives a snapshot of the cross section of the state. But more you cannot ask of sociological tests. Each research method has its field of application and boundaries of usage, beyond which its advantages turn into disadvantages. As the saying goes, every method is good its shortcomings.
Unlike sociological sociological tests, the questionnaire allows you to show phenomena in their dynamics, to identify the factors that affect them, to identify the main trends of their development. Thus, the questionnaire not only takes the information about the orientation of the dismissal but also to determine the factors that influence this installation, i.e. building a dynamic model of the relationships of factors towards orientation to the dismissal of the studied group of respondents.