But, even assuming that all these conclusions about distance and entity foggy spots really are true, the essence of the hypothesis of foggy masses it does not change. Let's say that each of these pale spots there is a star system, so far distant from us that all its countless stars together give us less light than one small star of our a star system. This assumption wouldn't disagree with the opinion that stars belonging to them the planets were formed by accumulation of vague substance. Although without a doubt, if denied the existence of vague the substance in which the process of condensation would be committed to the present time, one of the proofs in favor of the hypothesis of the nebulae falls; but at the same time the rest of the proof remains in full force. Nothing prevents us from to assume that although at present we do not see that anywhere was the condensation of nebulous matter, but there was a time when this process were committed everywhere. In fact, one could argue that it is unlikely that we have the right to expect that the thickening of scattered nebulous matter continued now, as the reasons for the accumulation of the same mass must was to act on all masses, and, consequently, the existence nechestivye mass would be the fact requiring explanation. Thus, allowing direct conclusions from the discoveries made with the help of a six-foot reflector, we see that the investigation, many of here to be displayed approved can not be.
1 comment:
But, even assuming that all these conclusions about distance and
entity foggy spots really are true, the essence of the hypothesis of foggy masses
it does not change. Let's say that each of these pale spots
there is a star system, so far distant from us that all its countless
stars together give us less light than one small star of our
a star system. This assumption wouldn't disagree with the opinion that
stars belonging to them the planets were formed by accumulation of vague
substance. Although without a doubt, if denied the existence of vague
the substance in which the process of condensation would be committed to the present time,
one of the proofs in favor of the hypothesis of the nebulae falls; but at the same time
the rest of the proof remains in full force. Nothing prevents us from
to assume that although at present we do not see that anywhere
was the condensation of nebulous matter, but there was a time when this process
were committed everywhere. In fact, one could argue that it is unlikely that we
have the right to expect that the thickening of scattered nebulous matter continued
now, as the reasons for the accumulation of the same mass must
was to act on all masses, and, consequently, the existence
nechestivye mass would be the fact requiring explanation. Thus,
allowing direct conclusions from the discoveries made with the help of
a six-foot reflector, we see that the investigation, many of here to be displayed
approved can not be.
Post a Comment