Risking accusations of too frequent repetition, I think however, appropriate to briefly recall a few major categories facts that are explained by the hypothesis of Darwin, as otherwise can be hard to understand what follows. I'm a little hesitant to do it as the old hypothesis driven Darwinova, has never been popular and recently brought such complete oblivion that the majority of readers hardly aware of their existence and therefore can not understand how a successful explanation of Darwin compared to unsuccessful attempts previous explanations of these four main facts, we note here. First of all the facts devices, examples of which have already been given above, the most convincing. It is unclear, for example, how special the adaptation observed in plants-angler could be made the accumulated impact of the departure on the structure. But you can easily understand that device this could be caused by sequential selection of favorable modifications. Or no less wonderful adaptation of flycatchers, or even more striking adaptation of one of the water plants for fishing young fish. It is impossible to explain the direct influence of one enhanced use of the formation of such skin outgrowths as the needle porcupine. But if we assume that some individuals of a species, generally devoid of other types of protection could acquire the stiffness of the wool, which made them less appetizing meal, it remains for a satisfactory explanation to make it is possible that such best is protected individuals experienced others and in a consistent number of generations wool changed in the bristle, bristle - in spikes, the spikes in the needle (as all these education is homologous); in this way could make the transition of wool in the thorns.
1 comment:
Risking accusations of too frequent repetition, I think
however, appropriate to briefly recall a few major categories
facts that are explained by the hypothesis of Darwin, as otherwise
can be hard to understand what follows. I'm a little hesitant to do it
as the old hypothesis driven Darwinova, has never been popular and
recently brought such complete oblivion that the majority of readers
hardly aware of their existence and therefore can not understand how
a successful explanation of Darwin compared to unsuccessful attempts
previous explanations of these four main facts, we note here.
First of all the facts devices, examples of which have already been given
above, the most convincing. It is unclear, for example, how special
the adaptation observed in plants-angler could be made
the accumulated impact of the departure on the structure. But you can easily understand that
device this could be caused by sequential selection of favorable
modifications. Or no less wonderful adaptation of flycatchers, or
even more striking adaptation of one of the water plants for fishing
young fish. It is impossible to explain the direct influence of one
enhanced use of the formation of such skin outgrowths as the needle
porcupine. But if we assume that some individuals of a species, generally
devoid of other types of protection could acquire the stiffness of the wool, which made
them less appetizing meal, it remains for a satisfactory explanation
to make it is possible that such best is protected
individuals experienced others and in a consistent number of generations wool
changed in the bristle, bristle - in spikes, the spikes in the needle (as all these
education is homologous); in this way could make the transition of wool in the thorns.
Post a Comment