Although the doctrine of cells exposed to significant changes relatively with the way it is formulated Schwann and Schleiden, the at least these changes are not contrary to the fundamental position that are visible to to the naked eye organisms made up of invisible organisms in using this expression in its most General sense And if you follow the development of any animal, it turns out that, being the first nuclear the cell and subsequently transformed by spontaneous fission in a group of nuclear cells, the animal passes through successive stages and forms from a constantly reproducing and mutating in various direction of cells in certain tissues and organs of the adult form. From the point of view of the evolutionary hypothesis, this universal trait organisms although not represents nothing amazing, but not less than significant. She is proof that all visible life forms arose by the Union of invisible forms, which, after his division, retained among themselves the relationship, instead of leading independent existence. Various known intermediate forms. From the plant world, algae of the type Volvox present us with an example of a composite Prokofyevich with individuals, so little United, that they live isolated among themselves, in small only, depending on the life of all unit. From the animal world example of a similar relationship between lives units and life of the whole group can serve as Uroglena and Syncrypta. Starting from these initial stages can be traced, passing through consistently high types, increasing dependence of the individual units from the unit, although this relationship still leaves them significant sector of private activities. Comparing these facts with the phenomena presented breeding cage and processes the crushing of the cells in each developing the embryo, scientists now conclude that through such the process of the growth of Protozoa were formed all classes of Metazoa {"A Treatise on Comparative Embryology, by Francis M. Balfour". Vol. II, dac XIII (second edition)} (as it is now called the arisen by this species) and that in a similar way from Protophyta happened all classes of plants, which it should, in my opinion, give the name of the Metaphyta, though the word, I had not yet accepted the appeal.
If we ask ourselves the question that we really know about the plant, excluding all ideas associated with words life and death, we will find that the sole facts known to us boil down to the assertion that in the plant there are some mutually the sub-processes in the presence of some promotion or hampering influences from outside and in some cases, especially in the structure or favorable circumstances allow these mutually the slave processes continue longer than in other cases. On the other the parties, in the aggregate these numerous internal and external actions that determine the life and death of organisms, we have not seen anything this, what may be applicable to the expressions- "fitness and inability" in the physical sense (fitness and unfitness). If the key suitable (fits) to the lock or a glove to the hand, then the ratio is one to the other is accessible. Nothing to do with this kind of adaptation is not the case when the body continues to live under certain conditions. Neither the individual parts that make up the body, no their individual movements, nor those combined movements of certain of these parts, of which is a vital activity, not just similar in its relations to objects and actions in their environment. It is obvious that usually use the term "the fittest" is just a figure of speech, it implies the fact that the cash the surrounding influences one organism, characterized by this expression, has to or greater than the other organisms of this type, the ability to maintain the equilibrium of its vital shipments, or that his power breeding he is so superior to other organisms that at the same as they do, a lifespan it has more of a chance to live in posterity. Indeed, as we see here, the term "the fittest" should include those cases where the individual has less than commonly, the ability to experience, but the lack of it abundantly reimbursed higher degree of fertility. I considered this question with intention to emphasize the need to study the incident and always occurring in organisms changes with exclusively physical point of view.
2 comments:
Although the doctrine of cells exposed to significant
changes relatively with the way it is formulated Schwann and Schleiden, the
at least these changes are not contrary to the fundamental position that are visible to
to the naked eye organisms made up of invisible organisms
in using this expression in its most General sense And if you follow
the development of any animal, it turns out that, being the first nuclear
the cell and subsequently transformed by spontaneous fission in
a group of nuclear cells, the animal passes through successive stages and
forms from a constantly reproducing and mutating in various
direction of cells in certain tissues and organs of the adult form.
From the point of view of the evolutionary hypothesis, this universal trait
organisms although not represents nothing amazing, but not
less than significant. She is proof that all visible
life forms arose by the Union of invisible forms, which, after his
division, retained among themselves the relationship, instead of leading
independent existence. Various known intermediate forms. From
the plant world, algae of the type Volvox present us with an example of a composite
Prokofyevich with individuals, so little United, that they live
isolated among themselves, in small only, depending on the life of all
unit. From the animal world example of a similar relationship between lives
units and life of the whole group can serve as Uroglena and Syncrypta. Starting from
these initial stages can be traced, passing through consistently
high types, increasing dependence of the individual units from the unit,
although this relationship still leaves them significant sector of private
activities. Comparing these facts with the phenomena presented
breeding cage and processes the crushing of the cells in each developing
the embryo, scientists now conclude that through such
the process of the growth of Protozoa were formed all classes of Metazoa {"A Treatise
on Comparative Embryology, by Francis M. Balfour". Vol. II, dac XIII (second
edition)} (as it is now called the arisen by this species) and that
in a similar way from Protophyta happened all classes of plants, which
it should, in my opinion, give the name of the Metaphyta, though the word,
I had not yet accepted the appeal.
If we ask ourselves the question that we
really know about the plant, excluding all ideas associated with
words life and death, we will find that the sole facts known to us
boil down to the assertion that in the plant there are some mutually
the sub-processes in the presence of some promotion or
hampering influences from outside and in some cases, especially in
the structure or favorable circumstances allow these mutually
the slave processes continue longer than in other cases. On the other
the parties, in the aggregate these numerous internal and external
actions that determine the life and death of organisms, we have not seen anything
this, what may be applicable to the expressions- "fitness and
inability" in the physical sense (fitness and unfitness). If the key
suitable (fits) to the lock or a glove to the hand, then the ratio is one to
the other is accessible. Nothing to do with this kind of
adaptation is not the case when the body continues
to live under certain conditions. Neither the individual parts that make up the body, no
their individual movements, nor those combined movements of certain of these
parts, of which is a vital activity, not just
similar in its relations to objects and actions in their environment.
It is obvious that usually use the term "the fittest" is
just a figure of speech, it implies the fact that the cash
the surrounding influences one organism, characterized by this expression,
has to or greater than the other organisms of this type, the ability
to maintain the equilibrium of its vital shipments, or that his power
breeding he is so superior to other organisms that at the same
as they do, a lifespan it has more of a chance to live in posterity.
Indeed, as we see here, the term "the fittest"
should include those cases where the individual has less than
commonly, the ability to experience, but the lack of it abundantly
reimbursed higher degree of fertility. I considered this question with
intention to emphasize the need to study the incident and always
occurring in organisms changes with exclusively physical point of view.
Post a Comment