Before directly to proceed to the explanation of the difficulties I allow myself to resort to circumstantial evidence showing that the lack of recognized evidence may occur does not that such evidence is not enough. Inattention or lack of the latter often lead to the neglect of such facts, that in fact available in abundance; it is well illustrated by the example of a study on the prehistoric era. Walking under the influence of the belief that footprints of a person no on the earth's surface in other units, except for the most superficial, geologists and anthropologists not only did not wish to seek such traces, but for a long time continued to laugh at those who claimed to have found such traces. When Boucher de Perthes'y managed finally to open the eyes representatives of science an indication of the flint tools, open them in Quaternary deposits of the valley of the Somme, and when geologists and anthropologists convinced finally that the evidence of human existence can be we find in the formations are quite deep age, and when scientists began to look for further evidence, then they began to find their a lot of everywhere. The same thing happened with the question concerns us closer; we could see that arrogant attitude to the hypothesis organic evolution, which is treated in General naturalists to the publication of Darwin's work, prevented them to see the numerous facts that confirmed this hypothesis. Quite similarly, the lack of recognition the nature of hereditary transmission of such changes of structure, which are caused by a change in shipments, forcing the naturalists to be lightly to the evidence confirm such transfer and do not allow them to search for further evidence of this kind.
1 comment:
Before directly to proceed to the explanation of the difficulties
I allow myself to resort to circumstantial evidence showing that
the lack of recognized evidence may occur does not
that such evidence is not enough. Inattention or lack of the latter
often lead to the neglect of such facts, that in fact
available in abundance; it is well illustrated by the example of a study on
the prehistoric era. Walking under the influence of the belief that footprints of a person
no on the earth's surface in other units, except for the most superficial,
geologists and anthropologists not only did not wish to seek such traces, but for a long
time continued to laugh at those who claimed to have found such
traces. When Boucher de Perthes'y managed finally to open the eyes
representatives of science an indication of the flint tools, open them in
Quaternary deposits of the valley of the Somme, and when geologists and anthropologists
convinced finally that the evidence of human existence can be
we find in the formations are quite deep age, and when
scientists began to look for further evidence, then they began to find their
a lot of everywhere. The same thing happened with the question
concerns us closer; we could see that arrogant attitude to the hypothesis
organic evolution, which is treated in General naturalists to
the publication of Darwin's work, prevented them to see the numerous facts that
confirmed this hypothesis. Quite similarly, the lack of recognition
the nature of hereditary transmission of such changes of structure, which
are caused by a change in shipments, forcing the naturalists to be
lightly to the evidence confirm such transfer and
do not allow them to search for further evidence of this kind.
Post a Comment