Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
Again, the questionnaire is considered to be correctly prepared, if it generally has a small number refused to answer. In addition, the schedule of allocation of attention and interest the Respondent must have a positive direction or at least constant. Not allowed if refused to answer, will be more than 10%, unless of course that requires a response of the respondents.-- The form must have equal distribution of answers of respondents on the alternatives in the order of their descending order. This means that neither the one alternative in terms of technical building issue has not received priority.-- That the questionnaire technically correctly constructed, indicative and subjective time reported by respondents. It should be set to actual time spent on completing the questionnaire some respondents and recorded by objective methods or less. To determine the subjective time usually at the end of the questionnaire during the pilot survey question: "please Mark how much (about) time You completed the survey?" and proposed timeline.-- Of course, these methods of validation questionnaire is not enough to be sure of getting reliable information. As well, and technically well-constructed questionnaire is not sufficient to obtain true, accurate and reliable information. But technically, a properly constructed questionnaire can serve as a reliable basis for obtaining accurate and reliable information. Conversely, if technically incorrectly constructed research methodology it is safe to say that reliable information with its help will not receive.When piloting the study it is necessary to check the questionnaire, at least for the items discussed above, as other methods of verification there are few, they are all quite time consuming and takes almost more time than the study itself. Therefore, sociologists do not always want to check your profile. The proposed methods are quite simple and reliable, they can be easily automated, i.e., translate on a computer, which will help with the introduction of some formal criterion to calculate the index technically well-designed questionnaire.After conducting the pilot study, the questionnaire will be checked again according to the same rules by which they were developed, but now based on the results of pilot studies, taking into account the views of the respondents. I must say that most of the pilot survey substantially corrects the initial version of the questionnaire.Usually a pilot study is carried out once. In fact, like any other tools, it requires repeated inspections. A pilot study should be carried out not just once but as many as necessary to be completely confident that the technique worked completely and each question is built securely.After elimination of defects and shortcomings identified in the first pilot study, require re-piloting a survey to find out how it works, adjusted the method. If the instrumentation is very complex and requires great precision (for example, when a predictive study), it is necessary to hold a third pilot study. Only after a thorough practical working methods can be released into the light and be completely confident that they will receive credible and reliable information. In the natural Sciences testing of the survey instruments is a mandatory step, whereas in sociology today still have to prove and convince that it was necessary.It bears repeating: no matter how long we engaged in arguments, they remain the logical structures, which are not always successful. And only practice can point our mistakes. In the process of development of the questionnaire the practice acts of the pilot survey. So ignore it, as, unfortunately, this is often what new sociologists, it is impossible.
Post a Comment