As you can see, P. Bitsilli constantly operates with the Toolkit the binary representation of the situation. Similarly, he analyzes the situation post-revolution: "deliberately posed in the October revolution goal it was -- the complete replacement of "State" "Society" and "politics" -- "culture" (Idea). To achieve this goal, first one part of the people, then at the end of the civil war, the whole the people were delivered in position "external" of the enemy, as it was under Ivan the terrible. Other the words "politics" got total domination. And thus the Idea which nominally prevailed, he turned, keeping all the symbols and their forms of realization, into its opposite" (ibid. P. 65). In the last case we are talking about the idea of social justice. Not speaking of false ideas, believes P. Bitsilli, since each idea corresponds to some inner experience. "Every idea always gives the beginning of a myth and usually it is in this mythical shell and is historical force" (Bitsilli, P. M. the Nation and the People // ibid. P.69).
* * * Now we will try to answer the following question, why the historical approach was so rich outputs on semiotics. What matters put and tried to resolve in our specific slice of historical approach? We can list the following are fundamentally semiotic and the results: -- reconstruction of the entire sign system according to the preserved isolated signs -- features iconic mechanisms of culture, in this case medieval, - the problem of symbol and symbolic. It is possible with sufficient confidence to say that in these historical research works that semiotic tools. This is due probably, the instability of the environment defined by the research situation the distant past. Some lack natural links leading to the need for a radical redesign of the system is largely based on a purely textual reality.
1 comment:
As you can see, P. Bitsilli constantly operates with the Toolkit
the binary representation of the situation. Similarly, he analyzes the situation
post-revolution: "deliberately posed in the October revolution goal
it was -- the complete replacement of "State" "Society" and "politics" --
"culture" (Idea). To achieve this goal, first one part of the people,
then at the end of the civil war, the whole the people were delivered
in position "external" of the enemy, as it was under Ivan the terrible. Other
the words "politics" got total domination. And thus the Idea
which nominally prevailed, he turned, keeping all the symbols and
their forms of realization, into its opposite" (ibid. P. 65). In
the last case we are talking about the idea of social justice. Not
speaking of false ideas, believes P. Bitsilli, since each idea
corresponds to some inner experience. "Every idea always gives
the beginning of a myth and usually it is in this mythical shell and is
historical force" (Bitsilli, P. M. the Nation and the People // ibid.
P.69).
* * *
Now we will try to answer the following question, why
the historical approach was so rich outputs on semiotics. What matters
put and tried to resolve in our specific slice of historical approach?
We can list the following are fundamentally semiotic and the results:
-- reconstruction of the entire sign system according to the preserved isolated
signs
-- features iconic mechanisms of culture, in this case
medieval,
- the problem of symbol and symbolic.
It is possible with sufficient confidence to say that in these historical
research works that semiotic tools. This is due
probably, the instability of the environment defined by the research situation
the distant past. Some lack natural links leading to
the need for a radical redesign of the system is largely based on
a purely textual reality.
Post a Comment