It should be recognized from the point of view of today's semiotics in Tartu collections, for example, could appear as a particular study type the above about the clock in the middle ages or the cock as symbol and a more General work about the functioning of medieval culture type research P. Bitsilli. Deviation from the generally accepted view -- your kind of "moving" the historian in the middle ages -- reveals to him not only the symbolic nature of life in the past, so is clearly impressed by the symbolism the contemporary life. Historian more clearly perceives the world as one of variants of possible worlds. P. Bitsilli directly writes: "the mental world of the human past differs from the psychic world modern man not only in content but also formally. Therefore, the history cannot be reduced to sociology. The historian is forced to reckon with the forms perception of the world at one time or another historic moment, just as is considered with them a psychologist studying mental processes in children, animals, pathological subjects" (Ibid. P. 132). In other words, the historian introduces almost in your tools of the semiotic idea of "point of view", only more complicated due to the inconsistency of forms of perception. Here is almost the same thing that has a place in the study of literature, which was the main a source of generation as a semiotic view, and a semiotic tools. There are the same (as in the case of theatre, cinema, painting, etc.) there is a variation which leads the researcher to the idea of symbolism, the underlying implementation of this variance.
1 comment:
It should be recognized from the point of view of today's semiotics in Tartu
collections, for example, could appear as a particular study
type the above about the clock in the middle ages or the cock as symbol and
a more General work about the functioning of medieval culture type
research P. Bitsilli. Deviation from the generally accepted view -- your
kind of "moving" the historian in the middle ages -- reveals to him not only
the symbolic nature of life in the past, so is clearly impressed by the symbolism
the contemporary life. Historian more clearly perceives the world as
one of variants of possible worlds. P. Bitsilli directly writes:
"the mental world of the human past differs from the psychic world
modern man not only in content but also formally.
Therefore, the history cannot be reduced to sociology.
The historian is forced to reckon with the forms perception of the world at one time or
another historic moment, just as is considered with them a psychologist
studying mental processes in children, animals, pathological subjects"
(Ibid. P. 132). In other words, the historian introduces almost in your
tools of the semiotic idea of "point of view", only more complicated
due to the inconsistency of forms of perception. Here is almost the same
thing that has a place in the study of literature, which was the main
a source of generation as a semiotic view, and a semiotic
tools. There are the same (as in the case of theatre, cinema, painting, etc.)
there is a variation which leads the researcher to the idea of symbolism,
the underlying implementation of this variance.
Post a Comment