Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The threat -- because they represent to allother areas of knowledge like a constant threat; of course, nothe deductive Sciences, nor the empirical Sciences, nor philosophicalreflection, as long as they remain in its own dimension, notrisk "to move into the camp of" Humanities or "spot" yourselftheir epistemological impurity; but we know whatsometimes we have difficulties in establishing those interimlevels that connect to each other these three dimensionsepistemological space. The fact that the slightestdeviation plane these levels pushes the thought to the areataken by the Humanities, and hence the danger of "psychologism","sociology", -- in short, everything "anthropologism.",that becomes especially threatening when, for example, are understood properly, the relations of thought to formalization orwhen not subjected to the necessary analysis of the modes of being of life,labour and language. "Anthropological" in our days is the biggestinternal danger for knowledge. Sometimes hastily thinkpeople are already free from himself, as soon as he found outthat is neither the center of creation, nor the center of the space,neither the ultimate goal of life; but though man is no longer a king inworld Kingdom, although he has already more and not worth the focusbeing, anyway, the Humanities -- it's a dangerous intermediaries inthe space of knowledge. However, in fact itself is doomedtheir some kind of significant instability. And this, in turn,explains that all the complexity of "the Humanities", their fragility,their lack of confidence in its scientific character, their dangerous flirtation withphilosophy, their vague reliance on some other areasknowledge, their character -- is always secondary and derivative, however,a claim to universality, - that all of this is not, as oftenI think the consequence of any particular density of their object; the reasonthat is not a metaphysical status, not insurmountablethe transcendence of the person they're talking about, but allthe complexity of the epistemological configuration in which theywere placed, their constant relation to those threethe dimensions in which they find their own space.
Post a Comment