Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The first volume of "Capital" -- this interpretation"value," the whole Nietzsche-is the interpretation of several Greekwords, Freud -- the interpretation of those silent phrases thatsimultaneously support and undermine our apparent discourse,our fantasies, our dreams, our body. Philology as analysis of the entirewhat is said in the deep speech, has become a modern formcriticism. Where in the end of XVIII century it was about thatto outline the boundaries of knowledge, now try to untangle the syntaxbreak all forcible means of expression, to reiteratewords mean what is being said through them and despite them. Perhaps Godnow is not so much beyond our knowledge how manyon this side of our phrases; and if Western man is inseparable fromhim, it is not because of an irresistible desire to go beyondof experience, but due to the fact that the language itself is constantly awakensit under the shadow of his laws: "I'm Afraid we can'tfrom God, as long as we still believe in grammar"<$FNierzsche. LeCrepuscule des idoles, 1911, p.130.>. In the XVI century interpretationwent from the world (both things and texts) to divine speechit stood for; our interpretation, or, more precisely,the interpretation which developed in the nineteenth century, comes from the people,God, from our knowledge or chimeras to the words that make thempossible, and is not sovereigntyprimeval speech, and what we are without revealing more of the mouth, subject tolanguage and riddled with it. Thus, modern criticismdevotes himself to a very strange kind of calculatesthe: itmoving from the statement of the existence of language to the disclosure orderwhat it means, but clearly the deployment of the discourse toidentification of language in his own being. In modern thinking, methods of interpretation are opposedthe techniques of formalization: the first claiming to make languagespeaking from his depths, to get closer to whatit says, but without his participation; second-claimto control every possible language, harnessing it throughlaw that defines what is possible to say.
Post a Comment