Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Story image for royal wedding from The Hindu

Royal wedding on the cards in Mysuru

The Hindu-Mar. 1, 2016
The Kalyana Mantap, which has hosted royal weddings, auspicious events and the coronation of Mr. Yaduveer, is likely to be the setting for the wedding.
Story image for royal wedding from TIME

Why Downton Abbey Celebrated a Wedding With a Breakfast

TIME-Jan. 18, 2016
The English term “wedding breakfast,” however, appears to date from the 19th century. During a century when royal weddings set a slew of bridal precedents, ...
Story image for royal wedding from

Prince William and Kate visited a slum in Mumbai 10, 2016
The royal couple chose to visit the slum to meet representatives of a charity called SMILE that focuses on giving skills and opportunities to young people and ...
Story image for royal wedding from Washington Post

Ask Amy: Wedding guest feels royally put out

Washington Post-Aug. 31, 2016
Dear Amy: My 26-year-old niece is getting married. Her wedding theme is “Royal Wedding.” She has therefore requested that family members of the bride and ...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

So, the phrase is filled with syntactic elements
which is a more subtle division than the big figure
suggestions. It's a new dismemberment puts universal grammar
to have the choice: either to conduct the analysis at a lower
level than the level of the unit name, and identify, before
disclose the value, insignificant elements of which it is
the value is constructed, or by the regressive movement
to limit the unit name, recognizing her more
limited measurements and finding it associated with
performance efficiency is below the level of entire words -- in
particles, in syllables, even within letters. These opportunities
open -- moreover prescribed -- from the moment when
the theory of languages takes as the object of discourse and analysis
its role in the dismemberment of submissions. They define contentious
question, split grammatistes of the XVIII century.
"Can we assume, says Harris, is that --
any value, like the body, divisible into an infinite number of other
values that are themselves divisible to infinity? It would be
absurdity. So you need need to assume that
there are signifiers of sounds, no part of which is not
may itself have value"<$F Id., ibid., p.57.>. When
the decay or in the indeterminate state associated with
representation of the meanings of words total value disappears; at the same
appear in their independence, such items that are not
articulates with the thinking and communication which can not be reduced to
relations of the discourse. There is a "mechanism" inherent in the
the correspondences, offices, inflections, syllables and sounds, and
no value representations cannot explain this
mechanism. Need to consider language as those machines that
gradually improved<$F A. Smith. Considerations sur
l'origine des langues, p.430-431.>: in its simplest form
the phrase consists only of subject, verb-definition, and
any addition of meaning requires a new supply;