Saturday, November 23, 2019

Story image for royal wedding from (blog)

Prince Carl Philip and Sofia Hellqvist's engagement photos ... (blog)-Oct. 8, 2014
Royal fans were quick to draw comparisons between the Swedish couple ... of Cambridge, née Kate Middleton, when they shared their wedding news in 2010.
Story image for royal wedding from

Marriage boom as Britain experiences the feel-good factor 11, 2014
Predictions of the death of marriage in Britain have been dealt a powerful blow by new figures suggesting the biggest rise in the number of peple tying the knot ...
Story image for royal wedding from (blog)

Ten show-stopping royal wedding cakes (blog)-Jan. 8, 2014
See the ten most show-stopping royal wedding cakes that I have picked out and choose your favourite! 10. Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew. When Sarah ...
Story image for royal wedding from Just Jared

Pippa Middleton Accused of Wearing 'False Bottom' to Royal ...

Just Jared-May 7, 2014
Pippa has recently been accused by French royal Stephane Bern of wearing a fake bottom for the Royal Wedding in 2011. "But of course she had a false bottom.

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

On the other hand, this research
are studying the human error, more or less
habitual and difficult to overcome, play a role of some
transcendental dialectic,showing that the knowledge has
their historical, social, or economic conditions that it
occurs inside developed between people relationship, it
can not depend on the specific forms, which take
these relations, in short -- that there is a history
human knowledge that is given in
empirical knowledge and prescribe its forms.
For these two studies it is characteristic that they are, in
appear to do not have no need in each other, more
the fact-that they can do without intelligence (or theory
of the subject); they claim full independence, as
as transcendental reflection there themselves
content. But in fact, the study of nature or history
knowledge, by its motion to impose a critical dimension
on the content of empirical knowledge, already presupposes
the use of some form of criticism. This criticism should not
to be merely an exercise of pure reflection, but the result of a number of more
or at least vague operation. First there are sufficiently clear,
although arbitrary dismemberment: this distinction between
a rudimentary, imperfect, unsettled, still
emerging knowledge of the fact: which if not yet completed,
at least established a more or less stable and
certain forms, -- such a distinction allows us to study
natural preconditions of knowledge; then the distinction between
error and truth, between ideological Chimera and scientific
theory (this distinction allows you to explore historical
the conditions of cognition).