Professor Huxley has recently shown: 1) that this empirical method, who introduced Cuvier as absolutely subordinate, was appointed only in the help the rational method is in reality the same which Cuvier used commonly; the so-called rational dead letter; 2) that he Cuvier in many places, so recognize the inapplicability an efficient method that, in essence, refused it, as from the method. Moreover, Huxley argues that the law required ratio wrong. Completely recognizing the physiological dependence of one part from another he denies the immutability of this dependence. "Thus, the teeth of the lion and his the stomach is composed in such relation that the stomach digests the food teeth torn; they relate physiologically, but there is no reason to believe, so it was a necessary physiological correlation, in the sense that it is not could be the other teeth, and other stomach, as suitable for animal eating human meat. The number and shape of teeth could be quite different from the present, the device of the stomach could be significantly different, and the administration of these bodies could be done as well good."
1 comment:
Professor Huxley has recently shown: 1) that this empirical method,
who introduced Cuvier as absolutely subordinate, was appointed only in the help
the rational method is in reality the same which Cuvier
used commonly; the so-called rational dead
letter; 2) that he Cuvier in many places, so recognize the inapplicability
an efficient method that, in essence, refused it, as from the method.
Moreover, Huxley argues that the law required ratio
wrong. Completely recognizing the physiological dependence of one part from another
he denies the immutability of this dependence. "Thus, the teeth of the lion and his
the stomach is composed in such relation that the stomach digests the food
teeth torn; they relate physiologically, but there is no reason to believe,
so it was a necessary physiological correlation, in the sense that it is not
could be the other teeth, and other stomach, as suitable for
animal eating human meat. The number and shape of teeth could be
quite different from the present, the device of the stomach could be
significantly different, and the administration of these bodies could be done as well
good."
Post a Comment