True, however, that such organic relationships the negation of which is unthinkable, is extremely rare. If we find the skull, vertebrae, ribs and some other bones of some quadruped the size of an elephant, we you can be sure that his feet are like four-legged was significant values - a lot more foot rats, the right to assume the ratio is necessary based not only on research-moving organisms but all the experiments on the masses and support the masses. But not only that the reality is a little too similar to the physiological relations - the way these arguments is some danger, because it may reason to apply to be the class need correlations that are not required. It would seem, for example, that between the eyes and body surface there is a necessary correlation: for vision need the light; hence, one would assume of course need to eye placed outside. There are, however, creatures like Cirrbipoedia whose eyes are (not very active, maybe) fit in depth of body. One would assume a necessary relationship between the size of the uterus in mammals and size of their pelvis. A priori it seems impossible to have any kind existed quite developed uterus with perfect Bud and a small pelvic arch, which would not allow to put this Bud. If there was any similar mammal and if it was a fossil, according to the method of Cuvier had to conclude that the embryo was supposed to come out in an undeveloped condition, and the uterus was small. But there were living mammal with a very small arc of the pelvis - a mole that has delivered us from this erroneous conclusion. No matter how anomalous this fact, but a baby mole does not pass through the pelvic arch, and past it. So, recognizing that some quite direct physiological correlation necessary, we risk attributed to him and those who do not have this character.
1 comment:
True, however, that such organic relationships
the negation of which is unthinkable, is extremely rare. If we find the skull, vertebrae,
ribs and some other bones of some quadruped the size of an elephant, we
you can be sure that his feet are like four-legged was significant
values - a lot more foot rats, the right to assume the ratio is
necessary based not only on research-moving organisms
but all the experiments on the masses and support the masses. But not only that
the reality is a little too similar to the physiological
relations - the way these arguments is some
danger, because it may reason to apply to be the class need
correlations that are not required. It would seem, for example, that between
the eyes and body surface there is a necessary correlation: for vision
need the light; hence, one would assume of course
need to eye placed outside. There are, however, creatures like
Cirrbipoedia whose eyes are (not very active, maybe) fit in
depth of body. One would assume a necessary relationship between
the size of the uterus in mammals and size of their pelvis. A priori it seems
impossible to have any kind existed quite developed uterus with
perfect Bud and a small pelvic arch, which would not allow
to put this Bud. If there was any similar
mammal and if it was a fossil, according to the method of Cuvier had
to conclude that the embryo was supposed to come out in an undeveloped condition, and
the uterus was small. But there were living mammal with a very small arc of the pelvis -
a mole that has delivered us from this erroneous conclusion. No matter how anomalous this
fact, but a baby mole does not pass through the pelvic arch, and past it.
So, recognizing that some quite direct physiological correlation
necessary, we risk attributed to him and those who do not have this
character.
Post a Comment