Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The tendency to generalization, which to a greater or lesser extent haveall minds, and without which, indeed, intelligence cannot exist, hasits inevitable inconveniences. Only through her can be achievedtrue, but it almost inevitably involves us inmisleading. Without the desire to argue about every new case thatwas true in the cases due to observation, rational thinkingit would be impossible. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strive to constantlymakes people make based on a limited number of experiments, suchthe provisions, which they mistakenly ascribe to a universal and unconditional loyalty.On the one hand, however, this circumstance hardly can be viewed asevil, because without premature generalizations we never would have come totrue generalizations. If in order to formulate the facts, wewaited until they are all assembled, unorganized mass of accumulatedthe facts would be so great that we would not be able to cope. Onlyusing temporary group, they can be given in this order inwhich become available further development, and this timegrouping is only another name for the provisional generalization.A great example of how consistently people follow this path and whatthe necessary steps to truth is a fallacy, is the storyastronomy. The heavenly bodies describe circles around the Earth, said the earliestobservers, based in part on visible facts, and partly on what theyit was known from experience about the movements taking place on the ground near the centers.Taking in the absence of any other view, all suchfor circular motion, they likened them and the movement of celestial bodies. Without thispreliminary views, no matter how mistaken it was, it would be impossiblecomparison of provisions, which showed that the movement of heavenly bodies is notto represent circles, and led to the hypothesis of epicycles and eccentrics. Onlyusing this hypothesis, it is equally wrong, but giving a better explanationvisible phenomena and thus leading to more accurate observations,only with the help of this hypothesis became possible for Copernicus to prove thatthe heliocentric theory is more plausible than the geocentric, and Kepler -that planets move around the Sun in ellipses. Again, without thisapproximate truth revealed by Kepler, Newton could not reaching thethe General law which showed that the movement of heavenly bodies aroundyour center of gravity does not occur necessarily on the ellipse, but mayoccur and any other conic. Finally, onlyafter the law of gravity was checked, it became possible to determinethe actual paths of the planets, their old men and comets, and to prove that due toperturbations of the orbit are always more or less deviate from the right pathline. In these successive theories we may trace how the desire,the human mind to skip from few data to a widegeneralizations, appearing later on, or completely wrong, orvalid only partly, and the need for these transitional generalizationsemployees steps to a final synthesis.
Post a Comment