Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
But recognizing him all thesedignity, we should add that in the scientific world he enjoysnot such a high reputation both among the General mass of readers in partbecause our neighbours the Scots love has no measure about to blow yourdomestic celebrity, partly because of the charming waythe presentation, which distinguishes all the works of Hugh Miller and brought him a widereadership, partly, perhaps, owing to a commendable sympathy for thethe man who himself paved the way, - whatever it was, onlyshare it got this amount of praise, which, no matter how alien wedesire to deprive them of it, still should not be allowed to blind readersin regards to his limitations as a scientist. The fact that he was too fullygiven their preconceived ideas to be a philosopher in Geology. It allappropriate to be called a theologian, engaged in Geology. The prevailingthe idea, under the influence of which he wrote is evident from the titles of two of hisworks: Footprints of the Creator; the Witness stones. Consideringgeological facts as arguments that speak for a well-known religious viewsor against them, he could hardly relate to geological factsimpartially. Its main purpose was to refute the hypothesis of gradualdevelopment, anticipated the conclusions of which was antipathetic to him, the power of hisfeelings corresponded to the one-sidedness of his thinking He made that "Godcould just as easily and produce types by gradual development, as hesupport them by gradual development, the existence of the originalgreat reasons equal is compatible with both hypotheses." Nonethelessconsidered the hypothesis of the development contrary to the principles of the Christian religion andbecause tried to deny it the attention it apparently escaped thethe fact that the General geological doctrine, which held he,rejected by many on a similar basis and that he was repeatedlyattacked for his antichristian doctrine. He apparently didn't noticethat just as his opponents were wrong to go inirreligious those theories, which in his eyes had nothingnon-religious, and he could be wrong, judging on the same basistheory development in short, he lacked that highest faith which knows thatall truths should be in harmony among themselves, and which therefore quietly goingfor evidence wherever they led her.
Post a Comment