Another indirect confirmation of the hypothesis is that we get, taking her quite a clear idea about fetishism at all. When views of this kind surrounding objects, and forces are regarded as somewhat more or less some personal power in their nature. And a walking explanation of this view is that the human mind in the first stages of development I have to admit power over them, items in such shape. I this day put up with this interpretation, though always with a sense of some dissatisfaction. This dissatisfaction was, I believe, quite thorough. Specified theory barely even may, indeed, be called a theory; it is rather only the repetition of the same in different expressions. Uncivilized people commonly learn anthropomorphic ideas about others subjects, and noticed this fact here drawn to the theory that the savages supposed to imagine them in this way; this is the theory, with insufficient, in my opinion, mental base. With our present perspective, it becomes clear that fetishism is not the original phenomenon, and secondary. This follows almost by itself from what has been said above. However, allow us to trace all the stages of its emergence.
1 comment:
Another indirect confirmation of the hypothesis is that we
get, taking her quite a clear idea about fetishism at all. When
views of this kind surrounding objects, and forces are regarded as
somewhat more or less some personal power in their
nature. And a walking explanation of this view is that
the human mind in the first stages of development I have to admit
power over them, items in such shape. I this day put up with
this interpretation, though always with a sense of some dissatisfaction. This
dissatisfaction was, I believe, quite thorough. Specified
theory barely even may, indeed, be called a theory; it is rather only
the repetition of the same in different expressions. Uncivilized people
commonly learn anthropomorphic ideas about others
subjects, and noticed this fact here drawn to the theory that the savages
supposed to imagine them in this way; this is the theory, with
insufficient, in my opinion, mental base. With our present
perspective, it becomes clear that fetishism is not the original phenomenon, and
secondary. This follows almost by itself from what has been said above.
However, allow us to trace all the stages of its emergence.
Post a Comment