Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Pearl Necklace | Pearl Jewelry: Amy Jain and Pratik PatelNew York Times-Mar. 30, 2...

Pearl Necklace | Pearl Jewelry: Amy Jain and Pratik PatelNew York Times-Mar. 30, 2...: Amy Jain and Pratik Patel New York Times - Mar. 30, 2013 Mrs. Patel, 30, is a co-founder of BaubleBar.com, a New York-based online f...

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

But we can argue that "in the past era the same or closer
each other organic forms had a broader distribution area,
than at present". Perhaps it was so; but the arguments given in the
confirmation of this does not prove it. The argument on which
the basis for this conclusion, this has the disadvantage that it is very easy
to give an example of evidence about a circle. Fossils, as already
noted above, are the only data, on the basis of which
to ensure relevance far removed from one another of the formations.
So, if a simultaneity of distant formations we conclude by similarity
their fossils, how can we argue that similar
animals and plants were once more widely spread than
now, just on the basis that they meet the simultaneous
layers lying at a far distance from each other? Not obvious whether
the falsity of such reasoning? But even if it did not arise
such fatal objection, yet the proof given in
confirmation of this opinion, is unsatisfactory. We don't have
forget that the community of organic remains commonly taken for
sufficient proof of relevance in time, in fact, is
very incomplete community. When compare between sedimentary layers
far away from one another, it is impossible to expect that there be many kinds,
common to both of them; it is sufficient if it appears a significant number of common
childbirth. If it could be proved that during the geological past each
the family lived only in the continuation of the short time - span
measured one particular group of strata, - could still be anything
to conclude from such community of birth. But it is quite another matter when we find out
many genera continued to exist during the vast epochs measured
several extensive systems of reservoirs "Between birth shellfish known
called zhemchuzhnikova (Avicula), pa-koskovich (Modiola), POWERLINK
(Terebratula), spatulas (Lingula), circles (Orbicula) are starting
from the Silurian rocks up to the present time." So, if between
the most ancient formations containing fossils, and the newest there is
this degree of commonality, it is not whether we have a right to conclude that, for all
probability, there must be great similarity between such layers
does not belong to the same era?