As for those few who rejected the teachings set forth above the words of Huxley, and who, adhering to the doctrine of continuous evolution, tried to explain the phenomena of this evolution, I must say that although they recognized the cause was true, however she was insufficient to explain the greater part of the known facts, even if to prevent its effects during several successive generations. Being the time he one of those few, I, turning eyes back, amazed, as far as those facts that are consistent with protected views, monopolized consciousness and drove out of him the facts, disagree with them, as no matter of them convincing. This misconception had its base. Considering impossible to accept any doctrine which would have filled a gap in the natural connection of cause and recognizing the legitimacy of emergence and development of all organic forms by the accumulation of naturally occurring modifications, we assumed that the reason that explained some category of modifications, able to explain others, it was thought that the last in the end will be brought under the same reason, although it was it is unclear how this will happen. Finishing this preliminary observation, we repeat the already said above that about thirty years ago there was no passable theories about the origin of the living beings Of the two hostile doctrines none can withstand criticism. From this desperate situation, we were removed to a considerable so, for I do not think that absolutely, the book "Origin of species". This book brought to the scene a new factor, or the factor, part of which already admitted the other observer (as indicated by himself Darwin in his introduction to the second edition) and which it was from the beginning to say that it needs to play a huge role in the origin of animals and plants.
1 comment:
As for those few who rejected the teachings set forth above
the words of Huxley, and who, adhering to the doctrine of continuous evolution,
tried to explain the phenomena of this evolution, I must say that
although they recognized the cause was true, however she was
insufficient to explain the greater part of the known facts, even if
to prevent its effects during several successive generations. Being
the time he one of those few, I, turning eyes back, amazed,
as far as those facts that are consistent with protected views,
monopolized consciousness and drove out of him the facts, disagree with them, as
no matter of them convincing. This misconception had its base. Considering
impossible to accept any doctrine which would have filled a gap in
the natural connection of cause and recognizing the legitimacy of emergence and development
of all organic forms by the accumulation of naturally occurring
modifications, we assumed that the reason that explained some
category of modifications, able to explain others, it was thought that
the last in the end will be brought under the same reason, although it was
it is unclear how this will happen.
Finishing this preliminary observation, we repeat the already said
above that about thirty years ago there was no passable theories about
the origin of the living beings Of the two hostile doctrines none can withstand
criticism.
From this desperate situation, we were removed to a considerable
so, for I do not think that absolutely, the book "Origin of species".
This book brought to the scene a new factor, or the factor, part of which
already admitted the other observer (as indicated by himself
Darwin in his introduction to the second edition) and which
it was from the beginning to say that it needs to play a huge role in
the origin of animals and plants.
Post a Comment