The soul is nobler than the body, the body -- dominated by the nobility the head; of the senses the noblest is sight, so the eye nobler than the ear, etc. In the sphere of social relations in a hierarchical manner prevails unchallenged: all of society is composed of a ladder located "ranks," each of which admits its own "honor", its social function, up to "the rank of the poor." Each person assigned to his rank not only in this world but in the hereafter" (Ibid.P. 56-57). We dwelt on the hierarchy to understand it a dominant role for the device in the world. Moreover, this the hierarchy allows us to explain even those features of the world that he P. Bitsilli does not associate with her. This particular lack of attention to individual, which we will continue to say in connection with Lion By Karsavina. Bitsilli says that the individual is understood "as just phenomenal detection typical, all that is non-repeatable uniqueness of the individual is discarded. Each item is with those parties whom he is a representative of a particular category items, and personality is of interest because it expressed "in General" human" (p. 53). There is no doubt that here is the hierarchy of unique strikes, since the latter is not representable in higher levels. That is the description depleted because of the desire for a strong order. A similar paradox was in the history of semantics, when the theory Katz-Fodor was rejected I. Bar-Hillela because she could not describe non-repeating, recording it in the balance, and doing only those characteristics which were found in other descriptions.
1 comment:
The soul is nobler than the body, the body -- dominated by the nobility
the head; of the senses the noblest is sight, so the eye
nobler than the ear, etc. In the sphere of social relations in a hierarchical manner
prevails unchallenged: all of society is composed of a ladder located
"ranks," each of which admits its own "honor", its social
function, up to "the rank of the poor." Each person assigned to his rank not
only in this world but in the hereafter" (Ibid.P. 56-57).
We dwelt on the hierarchy to understand it
a dominant role for the device in the world. Moreover, this
the hierarchy allows us to explain even those features of the world that he
P. Bitsilli does not associate with her. This particular lack of attention to
individual, which we will continue to say in connection with Lion
By Karsavina. Bitsilli says that the individual is understood "as just
phenomenal detection typical, all that is
non-repeatable uniqueness of the individual is discarded. Each item is
with those parties whom he is a representative of a particular category
items, and personality is of interest because it
expressed "in General" human" (p. 53). There is no doubt that here is
the hierarchy of unique strikes, since the latter is not representable in
higher levels. That is the description depleted because of the desire for a strong
order. A similar paradox was in the history of semantics, when the theory
Katz-Fodor was rejected I. Bar-Hillela because
she could not describe non-repeating, recording it in the balance, and
doing only those characteristics which were found in other
descriptions.
Post a Comment