Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The second issue that I would like to offer, in part due toprevious. I would like to point out that, beginning with Marx, Nietzsche andFreud, the activity of interpretation becomes infinite. However, it was endless and in the XVI century, but then the signs were sentto each other only because the ratio of similarity is alwayslimited. Since the nineteenth century, the signs are interwoven in an endless chain,also infinite, but not because they are based on no limitedsimilarities, but because there is a kind of fatal openness, gaping. The incompleteness of interpretation, its fragmentation, that she alwayshangs in limbo on the edge itself, found in Marx,Nietzsche and Freud, I think, in a similar way: in the form of waiver of searchstart. The refusal of the "Robinson Crusoe" in Marx, which is so essential to Nietzschethe differences between "beginning" and "origin", always unfinishedthe analytical steps from Freud. Nietzsche and Freud especially, inlesser extent, Marx, manifested experience which I think is veryimportant to modern hermeneutics: the farther we move ininterpretation, the closer we become to the absolutely dangerous region,where interpretation is not simply forced to turn back, but where is shedisappears as such as interpretation, until the disappearance of theinterpreter. The point of the absolute, which always seeks the interpretationis at the same time, and the point of rupture. It is well known in the work of Freud gradually found thisstructurally open, structurally gaping character of interpretation. First, in"The interpretation of dreams," in implicit and allusive manner, as thereFreud, analyzing his own dreams, resorted to stophimself, for reasons of shame, to the inadmissibility of disclosure of personalsecrets.
Post a Comment