Pearl jewelry for bridal and wedding tradition, bridal pearl necklace set for wedding ceremony, pearl jewelry for graduation and wedding celebration
The hallmark of this tribasic episteme isthe problem of man as a biologically finite, doomed ha workin fear of starvation and riddled with structures of the language creatednot they arose before him. These topics of anthropology are, in Foucault,closely related to the modern episteme with the theme of the story. The story embodiesthe ultimate desire of man to get rid of their original limbsof being, to destroy it or at least reduce some of its role. Suchways of the modern episteme, according to Foucault, offers two: theyowned by Ricardo and Marx. For Ricardo, the movement of the story isgradually approaching the point of perfect balance between humanneeds and economic production and in the limit-stoptime. On the contrary, in Marx is the ratio of history and anthropology otherwise:speeding up the flow of the story increases economic production, andalso the number of people participating in this production, therethe brink of starvation; the people who have experienced fully the materialdestitution and spiritual deprivation, acquire the ability to change directionhistory through revolutionary action and thereby start a newtime, a new story. Diametrically opposed to these decisionsthe view of Foucault, is only apparent: the archaeological soil of both is one.Of course, to the reader, the Marxist, such an understanding is unacceptable:the revolutionary novelty of Marxism towards the theory of such classicsbourgeois political economy, as Ricardo, is clear and obvious. IfFoucault does not hesitate to use such an obvious break, it was only becausehis scheme replaces for him the facts. And it's not unique -- forsubstantially the same unscientific paradox looks the proclamation of Cuvier, andnot of Lamarck the precursor to evolutionary biology, what we discussed above.
Post a Comment