Saturday, November 23, 2019

Story image for royal wedding from Glamour

Queen Letizia's Style Rocks Our Royal World—Her Chicest ...

Glamour-Sep. 16, 2014
In 2010, the then Princess Letizia attended the Swedish royal wedding and quite possibly stole some thunder from the bride in this gorgeous floral-adorned ...
Story image for royal wedding from hellomagazine.com

Prince Felipe and Princess Letizia of Spain's wedding: relive ...

hellomagazine.com-May 21, 2014
The royal wedding, which followed Prince Frederik and Princess Mary's nuptials, took place on 22 May 2004 at the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid.
Story image for royal wedding from Telegraph.co.uk

Carole Middleton is embarrassed by us, claims god-daughter

Telegraph.co.uk-Aug. 24, 2014
However, she claims that since the royal wedding three years ago Mrs Middleton, her godmother and cousin once removed, has stopped visiting and contacting ...
Story image for royal wedding from hellomagazine.com

Princess Diana's wedding dress making its way home to sons ...

hellomagazine.com-Sep. 1, 2014
Calls are now being made for the royal wedding dress to be exhibited at Kensington Palace, where Diana's eldest son Prince William and his wife Kate are ...
Princes William and Harry Set to Receive Princess Diana's ...
Highly Cited-People Magazine-Sep. 2, 2014

1 comment:

Pearl Necklace said...

If the evolution of Western thought in the seventeenth and eighteenth century has deprived these
technology reason if bekonovskie and the Cartesian critique of resemblance
played a role in the fact that they were in brackets in the nineteenth century, and
first of all, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud has given us a new opportunity
interpretation, re-explained the possibility of hermeneutics.
Such works as the first book of "Capital" as "the Birth of tragedy..."
or "Genealogy of morality" as "the Interpretation of dreams", again put us
the face techniques of interpretation. And the shock effect, which has caused
these works, the kind of insult that they have caused the European
ideas are probably connected with the fact that before our eyes appeared again
something that Marx himself called "characters". This puts us in
uncomfortable position, because these techniques of interpretation affect us
themselves, because now we, as interpreters, with the help of these techniques
began to interpret themselves. But using the same techniques we have
now to explore themselves Freud, Nietzsche and Marx as interpreters, and
so we mutually are displayed in the endless game of mirrors.
Freud talked about the three great narcissistic disappointments in
European culture: the first is related to Copernicus, the second by Darwin,
prove the origin of man from apes, and the third by
Freud discovered that the conscious mind based on the unconscious. And I ask
yourself the question: is it possible to assume that Marx, Nietzsche and Freud, covering
us interpretation, always reflecting herself, has created around us - and
for us such mirrors, where the images that we see become
inexhaustible, insult, and this is what forms our present
narcissism? Anyway, I would like to make a few comments
for this reason. It seems to me that Marx, Nietzsche and Freud
increased the number of characters in the Western world. They gave no
a new sense of what before was meaningless. However, they changed
the very nature of the sign, the way in which generally can be interpreted
signs.